That's good to know. I had bought Meds.cc for $100 a few weeks ago.
So, if let's say for the sake of argument that Meds.cc is worth $500 - $1000, what do you think Meds.ws would be worth?
By the way, what do these tlds represent in the minds of users? I know what their literal definitions are, but what do people associate with them? For example, .net (to me) feels right for technical sites, .org feels right for organizations, etc.
I prefer .cc -- the extensions are cleaner and easier to remember.
slobizman said:
By the way, what do these tlds represent in the minds of users? I know what their literal definitions are, but what do people associate with them? For example, .net (to me) feels right for technical sites, .org feels right for organizations, etc.
Public perception of .cc is non-existent. (.ws) can be promoted as "website". It's doubtful that either would enjoy substantial advantage over the other in the end-user market. In answer to your question, whatever a .cc will bring, a .ws could also bring and vice-versa.
"Years ago I was a critic of any extension including .ws that I didn't understand or considered useless. I've grown out of that attitude as I realized that since I began developing I've never lost a visitor that clicked on our .ws links in the search engine and left because they weren’t on a .com. Main Street isn't the only street with traffic."