Which should be first?

Spacemail by SpaceshipSpacemail by Spaceship
Watch

yilduz

Your face is regfee!Established Member
Impact
30
I have some domains that I want to develop (heh, all of my domains need to be developed). I want to create something that brings in a little bit of revenue, but I don't know which one would be best to attempt. Which one do you think would have the best chance of being somewhat successful? Whichever would be most likely to succeed is what I'll start with first. I know none of my domains are great, but maybe at least good enough. None of my domains bring in anything at all, so even a little bit would be an improvement.

The domains I'm trying to develop are:
CloseTags.com - A site I'm making to do web development tutorials.

CyberNe.ws - I wanted a domain hack so I grabbed this one. I like it and some people have told me it's pretty cool. I figure a site about tech, gadget, domain, internet, etc news would be cool.

PaganDruid.com - A site I'm making for my girlfriend. It'll be a site about herbalism and stuff.

Scammed.me - This one should be obvious. I want to make a site where people can talk about scams. Users will be able to make a subdomain (for example, Godaddy.scammed.me) and tell about how they were scammed.

my mini-sites. I have a bunch of .info domains and some .coms and .nets I was going to develop into sites, but decided to create mini-sites out of them instead. I'm using the same template for all of them, I just have to write the content.

:-/
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
i'd do the html one as a blog. it'll take you maybe five hours with a good wordpress theme.

then as you develop the other ones, you can add all your coding tips you come up with/ remember into the html one as you go - and kill two birds with one stone

;)
 
0
•••
soggyindo said:
i'd do the html one as a blog. it'll take you maybe five hours with a good wordpress theme.

then as you develop the other ones, you can add all your coding tips you come up with/ remember into the html one as you go - and kill two birds with one stone

;)
That does make sense.

I've seen "wordpress" thrown around a lot but don't know what it is. If it's a template, I prefer to make my own.
 
0
•••
0
•••
ive worked with CloseTags.com good for social networking site.
and also Scammed.me since i received a lot of nigerian scam email everyday.
 
0
•••
yilduz said:
I've seen "wordpress" thrown around a lot but don't know what it is. If it's a template, I prefer to make my own.

"wordpress" is not a template, it's "a state-of-the-art publishing platform with a focus on aesthetics, web standards, and usability. WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time." ;)

http://www.wordpress.org
 
0
•••
I would start with the one that gets the most traffic.
 
0
•••
yilduz said:
I've seen "wordpress" thrown around a lot but don't know what it is. If it's a template, I prefer to make my own.

Wordpress is pretty much the easiest and cheapest way for a domainer to develop their names out.

:imho:

I'm writing a quick wordpress how-to at the moment on my first developed dot me if you're interested - click on "How To" at the top. (The site is made using wordpress if you want to see an example of what a Wordpress site can look like - anything is possible though.)
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Your .com domains probably have the best chance of being successful early on, because of Google preferring that extension in its search results.
 
0
•••
DomainRaiders.com said:
I would start with the one that gets the most traffic.


Thats what i would do!!!!

Plus sometimes it good to start off whith something your highly intrested in. this way the text flows from your mind, and is not so painful to write
 
0
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer
Appraise.net

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
NameMaxi - Your Domain Has Buyers
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back