NameSilo

Which is more profitable?

Namecheap AuctionsNamecheap Auctions
Namecheap AuctionsNamecheap Auctions
SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Which one?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Built Site

    4 
    votes
    57.1%
  • Programs like Sedo

    3 
    votes
    42.9%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Wesley

Established Member
Impact
1
I know they both have their advantages, but which is more profitable? Like, I know a constantly updated and absolutely fantastic site that's built is more profitable, but when you have a nice layout, some interesting content and updates every week or two, is it usually more profitable that things like Sedo?
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
there are a lot of factors involved there:

what industry, type-in traffic or no, how well the site is built, how much you know about SEO, what the conversions are like for that industry, etc.
 
0
•••
I voted on the sedo like program because if you don't have the gumption to go all out on a site it's the best way to go. If you are willing to work hard on a site that's different. It's all up to how much you are willing to put into it and your skill level.
 
0
•••
If you are looking into not developing a site I would say that Sedo is the way to go, however if you have a nice domain you know could develop then go ahead and develop it. You might also want to signup with things like Google AdSense and etc.
 
0
•••
Originally posted by Raf
If you are looking into not developing a site I would say that Sedo is the way to go, however if you have a nice domain you know could develop then go ahead and develop it. You might also want to signup with things like Google AdSense and etc.

righto
 
0
•••
DomainEasy: white label portfolios are live. Enable yours.

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Escrowly
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
Catchy
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back