domain webmasters-talk.com

[webgear]

Just regged this domain.
Appraisals please.

 

[Petter]

low xx$ :imho: ~ the 's' after webmater and '-' hurts it alot :imho:

 

[webgear]

yeah thank you for your apprais.

 

[nomis135]

i agree with Petter. the "s" hurts it.
Low xx maybe mid xx :imho:

 

[Aajiz]

low xx$ :imho: ~ the 's' after webmater and '-' hurts it alot :imho:

While endorsing Petter's post, I evaluate this name from Low $xx to Mid $xx.

Regards

 

[andyy15]

good keywords but - messes up value I have to agree low $xx to mid $xx for this one.

 

[sufi]

Reg Fee to Low $xx IMO

 

[Veolus]

reg fee - low $xx

 

[nicedomain4sale]

low $xx

 

[Eric]

It has a strong showing in OVT, with both keywords. Very strong. But the "s" at the end of webmaster and the "-" hurt it. I would have to say low "xx" to mid "xx" undeveloped.

 

[webgear]

Thanks for all appraisals !
Keep them going

 

[crazy]

mid to high xx$, has alot of potential has there continues to be more webmasters everyday.

 

[Zeeble]

if someone told me webmasters-talk.com, and I wanted to find it a week later, I would remember it as webmaster-talk.com. The plural really devalues it, reg fee IMO

 

[pratiknaik]

if someone told me webmasters-talk.com, and I wanted to find it a week later, I would remember it as webmaster-talk.com. The plural really devalues it, reg fee IMO

:bingo:

Low $xx IMHO,
Pratik

 

[Cheapquality]

reg fee to low xx