domain w3dictionary.com and w3thesaurus.com

[Scott]

Please appraise w3dictionary.com and w3thesaurus.com - registered purely for development purposes.

Thanks,
Scott!!

 

[dgridley]

Hehe, considering they were both on my list of potential w3 domains, I'd say I like them! Lots here don't like the W3 prefix but ... who cares what they think, lol?

Anyway, I'd say they obviously have more value developed, low xx o/w.

 

[Scott]

... who cares what they think, lol?

:lol: Yea, exactly!

Thanks dude.

 

[988]

Lots here don't like the W3 prefix but ... who cares what they think, lol?

AMEN!!

:D

Likewise i have W3 domains also..

 

[Unknown]

But aren't w3 domains mainly for development? Not many people understand the prefix w3 as being a substitue for Online or internet etc.

Low $xx wholesale.

 

[dgridley]

Possibly, but who knew a "e" or "i" in front of a domain meant anything?

As more are developed and seen, they will become more valuable as a whole, especially those with nice keywords.

But aren't w3 domains mainly for development? Not many people understand the prefix w3 as being a substitue for Online or internet etc.

Low $xx wholesale.

 

[dgridley]

Good to hear.. I plan to start developing mine soon.. New Year's resolution!

AMEN!!

:D

Likewise i have W3 domains also..

 

[superprogrammer]

Does W3 means WWW(World Wide Web)? or the gamin one?

 

[dgridley]

W3 is generally accepted as WWW but it has an alternate meaning for Warcraft 3. Obviously it has more utility when used as WWW.

Does W3 means WWW(World Wide Web)? or the gamin one?

 

[Tippy]

So, the w3 is an old thingy or considered an old thingy like the e or i style names?

 

[dgridley]

W3 has been around a long time... I think used first to describe the W3C .. the World Wide Web Consortium.

http://www.w3.org/

So, the w3 is an old thingy or considered an old thingy like the e or i style names?

 

[Tippy]

Thanks for the info/link David

 

[dgridley]

Just another reason why I wonder at the resistance to using W3... W3C sets the standards for the WWW.

Well, eventually it will come into it's own I think...

Thanks for the info/link David

 

[jeter4982]

I would say low - mid $xx , but I agree with you, I like the w3 prefix