Using Tables vs. CSS Question

SpaceshipSpaceship
SpaceshipSpaceship
SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

onthis

Established Member
Impact
1
Beginner to web page building. As I learn I read you can use html tables for page layout, as well as, CSS and I am wondering what are the Pros and Cons. I understand that html tables was originally used for data columns. Also what is the current HTML ver?
Thanks
 
0
Close
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
i think that html is at 4.01, although xhtml is the way to go now in conjunction with css. the main advantages i see of css over html are: faster loading; faster modifying/creating/fixing and; better search engine rankings.

why tables for layout is stupid: http://www.hotdesign.com/seybold/
 
0
Close
onthis said:
Beginner to web page building. As I learn I read you can use html tables for page layout, as well as, CSS and I am wondering what are the Pros and Cons. I understand that html tables was originally used for data columns. Also what is the current HTML ver?
Thanks

a html layout is relative to the seize of your browser but in css it can have a fixed size ( you can center it with the command <div align=center></div> btw;
put that around your main site and it will always be in the middle of your browser window )

css = cascading, means you can define a style in 3 ways
1. in an external file e.g. stylesheet.css
2. in the head of your html page
3. in addition to a html tag <p style="width:200px"></p>
 
0
Close
Coming along slowly

Thanks for the links and info. I am trying to learn some basic CSS. I seem to prefer the external style as it appears most flexible for creating multiple sites, using at least some of the same style sheets and it does make sense.
Got side tracked and stuck setting up a personal slackware web/file server. lol Everything I try to do is such a huge learning project!
 
0
Close
technically no differnece but css is just easier to modify ... tables make a big mess

both can be made seo friendly so neither have an edge over the other. Css does tend to load a bit faster than tables.
 
0
Close
0
Close
People who says that a tabular css layout is much lesser code or is less in size (kb) - Can they prove that a 500 row HTML table consumes more disk space then a 500 row css tabular layout?
 
0
Close
cancer10 said:
People who says that a tabular css layout is much lesser code or is less in size (kb) - Can they prove that a 500 row HTML table consumes more disk space then a 500 row css tabular layout?
You can just use <br /> tags for rows.
Another thing to consider: a pure CSS layout loads faster than a table structure, it takes more time to parse and render tables on the screen and nested tables do not help :)
 
0
Close
DomainEasy: flexible LTO options. Close more domain deals with financing.

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Domain Recover
CryptoExchange.com

NamePros updates

Switch between accounts
You can now stay logged in to more than one NamePros account in the same browser. Click your avatar, then "Accounts in this browser", to...
AIVikings
Catchy
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back