IT.COM

domain project.fm

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
Status
Not open for further replies.

M0rd0r

Established Member
Impact
399
Hi domainwizards!

What do you think about project.fm?

High xxx$ | Low x.xxx?

This exact name sold in another non.com:
project.berlin 3,702 USD 2018-02-06 Sedo
project.to 104 USD 2016-05-04 Park.io
project.la 1,990 USD 2015-08-13 Sedo
project.co 7,465 USD 2015-03-24 Sedo
project.pro 1,717 USD 2014-02-24 Sedo
project.us 2,000 USD 2006-02-28 Private

Thanks! :)
 
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Would you love to hear the truth or not?

If yes, then drop it.

Why?

Very few sales has not show up in recent years

Its live streaming age not FM era which make its value extremely going down

BTW,the extension of .FM of this country is not developing so as to few companies or personal want to Start their business with.FM.

You can reg some good country'name s last year

such as America.fm, Germany.Fm or Noway.fm and more.

Therefore , dont waste momey!
 
1
•••
Actually the .FM extension is seeing some decent activity in the podcasting space. I would not be surprised if there were a buyer out there for project.fm in the neighborhood of $5k-8k+. Are the renewals expensive? You might be to play the long game on this one...
 
4
•••
Actually the .FM extension is seeing some decent activity in the podcasting space. I would not be surprised if there were a buyer out there for project.fm in the neighborhood of $5k-8k+. Are the renewals expensive? You might be to play the long game on this one...

Agree. IMO this name really worth. Renewals are around 70$. and never down 55$.
 
0
•••
I once had an idea to invest into .fm. After some research though, and after finding A LOT of premium names, I decided against it. A lot of premium names available and no recent sales.
Your price range is probably correct, but be ready to hold quite a long time.
 
0
•••
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back