cosmicray said:
I agree with your view ... any perspective on .TVs ?
I find .TV difficult to predict. It is one of the highest potential extentions, but the price turns many people off. However, I personally would say .TV is one of the top-5 extentions definitely, coming just behind .COM .INFO and .EU/.US (.EU or .US dependent which continent you live in). I would say .TV comes very close to them, whereas for sites with many images it may be even better than .EU/.US/.INFO
In general I think .INFO is the best potential after .COM. .TV in my opinion is one of the best as well, I am not sure if many people would agree with me though.
I am very enthousiast about .EU as well, but I would only use it for European-orientated sites, just like I would only use .US for American-orientated sites. For sites with a global target audience, I would stick with .COM, .INFO or .NET as they are more international than US/EU. If there is one ccTLD that competes with .INFO and .COM for international sites, it is .TV as this has less country-specific ties than .US or .EU.
That's just my vision though. .INFO is very cheap which means many are registered. Because there's so many .INFO addresses existing, and because the word .INFO is so common, I think the extention has an incredible potential. I am an .INFO fan for sure, it's one of my favourites. I find it more generally usable than .NET personally: .NET gives a bit of a technical impression, whereas even the worst internet newbie knows what the word INFO means!
And one additional thing: I find .ORG a bit overrated. For any non-organisation or non-club, it is not really usable IMHO. I am not sure what to think of .BIZ, it gives me a bit of a weird impression because it is like how teens would write 'z' instead of 's'. I don't say they are not valuable at all, but I am not convinced by .ORG and .BIZ