global market share:Arizona desert would probally be better as an info domain. The org extension is not very popular.
Primary and secondary markets both value org above info. Orgs outnumber infos despite info costing less than a buck to hand reg. Sort available org vs info names by OVTN rank in a free tool like freshdrop: today the top 10 and 22 of the top 25 available are info. Nobody wants to risk $0.89. DNJ YTD Global Contenders Top 100 sales chart includes 29 orgs and 7 infos. Org enjoys a high degree of public trust relative to other TLDs and it is well suited for a desert information site. The strongest "resource" signal info emits is that the registrant's resources were <$1, which makes it a throwaway asset and leads to credibility suspicions.Yes but look at the name. "Arizonadesert"
Understand extensions.
.org represents the word "organization," and is primarily used by non-profits groups or trade associations.
.info is for credible resource Web sites and signifies a "resource" web site.
ArizonaDesert.org as the most appeal for me but been a .org low-mid $$, the .info would be worth up to ten times as much.

