domain LowCarb.cc

[DomainOgre]

Just happened upon this one today. I was excited until I saw the Ovt numbers lol. I was expecting a little more than 31k.

I guess this fad has kind of died down? Besides seeing "Low Carb" all over stores, it was one of the first .CCs available that I have come across with both its .eu.com and .us.com taken. Any opinion on its value?

 

[webgear]

low $xx IMHO

 

[DomainOgre]

Thanks for the appraisal .

 

[Petter]

reg. fee :imho:

Best of luck! :wave:

Petter

 

[hstpound]

.cc kills it, good name thou, dieting campaign
low $$ sorry

 

[Prosperous]

Very nice. I sold the .WS version of it for $250 last year (reseller), this one could be of similar value.


Best
Of
Luck!

Rob

 

[bizing]

low xx

(bullcats)

 

[hstpound]

verylow lol, unless you market it with that uk hellmans campaign sauces

 

[nomis135]

reg fee :imho:

 

[sufi]

reg fee - low $xx :imho:

 

[Aajiz]

Not more than Low to Mid $xx, IMO

Regards

 

[Qwert]

Wow people don't like this one all... Well I was thinking about Low-Med XXX until I saw this. In a country where people actually believe eating only fat will help you loose weight I would expect this to be much better.

A very popular diet, taken in .eu/.us.com and not a terrible extension (when talking about .eu.com and .us.com). Well reg fee still isn't too bad. Enough to buy like 5 or 6 .coms.

 

[FedPrimeRate.com]

I don't think you'll be able to get much more than $120 in the current retail market but the name has huge development potential. Even minimal development could increase your domain's value considerably as "low carb" diets are still quite the rage these days. You could also generate a decent income with minimal development, optimized content and adsense ads. Worth the time IMO.

AmCy

 

[DomainOgre]

Wow people don't like this one all... Well I was thinking about Low-Med XXX until I saw this.

Not arguing with anybody because its their opinion and they took the time to respond, but all the posts above yours, except one, are looking mainly at just the .cc. I can understand that because I used to think the same way lol. However, I look more at the left side of the domain these days. This especially true for development because I dont think search engines look at extensions at all.

 

[FedPrimeRate.com]

This especially true for development because I dont think search engines look at extensions at all.

Yup; check out space.cc. Extension doesn't hurt that site one bit, IMO.

AmCy

 

[DomainOgre]

Thanks . I was wanting to find some nice .cc sites, but I havent Googled it yet.

 

[RJ]

Wow people don't like this one all... Well I was thinking about Low-Med XXX until I saw this.

Not arguing with anybody because its their opinion and they took the time to respond, but all the posts above yours, except one, are looking mainly at just the .cc. I can understand that because I used to think the same way lol. However, I look more at the left side of the domain these days. This especially true for development because I dont think search engines look at extensions at all.

Good analysis, Ogre.

The peak of low carb dieting has come and gone with product sales dropping, etc,, but I don't see this diet/lifestyle going away. It will probably always remain a viable weight loss option.

 

[Mark]

I look more at the left side of the domain these days. This especially true for development because I dont think search engines look at extensions at all.

:bingo: The term has died off a bit now but Advertising and PPC is pretty consistent : Avg PPC @ Ovt is still $0.80 for the top 5 -

Mid to High xx$ w/o dev - But with a little TLC .... Who knows ?

Good Luck ~