NameSilo

available LLL.in countdown

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch
Status
Not open for further replies.

Rem

Established Member
Impact
8
I think the time has come to start quietly enters the final days LLL.in. On that occasion, a small statistics on them:

Domains starting at A-N/A
Domains starting at B-22
bfq.in
bkq.in
bqn.in
bqr.in
bqs.in
bqu.in
bqv.in
bqw.in
bqx.in
bqy.in
bqz.in
bvq.in
bwq.in
bwx.in
bxf.in
bxg.in
bxj.in
bxq.in
bxy.in
byq.in
byv.in
bzx.in

Domains starting at C-52
Domains starting at D-44
Domains starting at E-33
Domains starting at F-68
Domains starting at G-84
Domains starting at H-82
Domains starting at I-5

ijq.in
iuq.in
ivq.in
iyq.in
iyx.in

Domains starting at J-143
Domains starting at K-104
Domains starting at L-82
Domains starting at M-45
Domains starting at N-48
Domains starting at O-70
Domains starting at P-62
Most domains Q in the early-405
Domains starting at R-72
Domains starting at S-45
Domains starting at T-61
Domains starting at U-102
Domains starting at V-131
Domains starting at W-147
Domains starting at X-321
Domains starting at Y-309
Domains starting at Z - 339

At 03.12.07 left the entire 2875 free domains, and that about 16%

Of which
Without QZXY-88
dwj.in
dwv.in
fvw.in
gjw.in
gwv.in
hvw.in
jfv.in
jfw.in
jkw.in
juw.in
jvh.in
jvk.in
jwd.in
jwf.in
jwh.in
jwk.in
jwn.in
jwp.in
jwr.in
jwv.in
kjw.in
kvj.in
kwj.in
kwv.in
lvw.in
lwj.in
mjw.in
pvw.in
pwv.in
rjw.in
rvw.in
ujw.in
vhj.in
vhw.in
vjb.in
vjd.in
vjf.in
vjh.in
vjk.in
vjl.in
vjn.in
vjr.in
vjt.in
vjw.in
vkj.in
vkw.in
vnj.in
vrj.in
vrw.in
vtw.in
vwb.in
vwg.in
vwh.in
vwj.in
vwk.in
vwn.in
wcv.in
wdv.in
wgj.in
wgv.in
wjd.in
wjf.in
wjg.in
wjh.in
wjk.in
wjn.in
wjp.in
wjr.in
wjv.in
wkj.in
wkv.in
wnj.in
wpj.in
wrj.in
wrv.in
wtj.in
wvd.in
wvg.in
wvh.in
wvj.in
wvk.in
wvl.in
wvm.in
wvn.in
wvr.in
wvs.in
wvt.in
jgw.in

Without QZXYw-17

jfv.in
jvh.in
jvk.in
kvj.in
vhj.in
vjb.in
vjd.in
vjf.in
vjh.in
vjk.in
vjl.in
vjn.in
vjr.in
vjt.in
vkj.in
vnj.in
vrj.in

Without QZXYj-33

dwv.in
fvw.in
gwv.in
hvw.in
kwv.in
lvw.in
pvw.in
pwv.in
rvw.in
vhw.in
vkw.in
vrw.in
vtw.in
vwb.in
vwg.in
vwh.in
vwk.in
vwn.in
wcv.in
wdv.in
wgv.in
wkv.in
wrv.in
wvd.in
wvg.in
wvh.in
wvk.in
wvl.in
wvm.in
wvn.in
wvr.in
wvs.in
wvt.in

Without QZXYv-33

dwj.in
gjw.in
jfw.in
jkw.in
juw.in
jwd.in
jwf.in
jwh.in
jwk.in
jwn.in
jwp.in
jwr.in
kjw.in
kwj.in
lwj.in
mjw.in
rjw.in
ujw.in
wgj.in
wjd.in
wjf.in
wjg.in
wjh.in
wjk.in
wjn.in
wjp.in
wjr.in
wkj.in
wnj.in
wpj.in
wrj.in
wtj.in
jgw.in

Over the past few months, no one dropped domain!
 
3
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Unstoppable Domains โ€” AI StorefrontUnstoppable Domains โ€” AI Storefront
johnnywj said:
Most of my end user sales have been to peoples not living in India. Most of the
sales have been to peoples from Germany, England and USA.

I know that, but that`s indeed because Indian prefer .com or .co.in

Plus, I doubt those ones you sold so far were containing Z and Q or Q and J , were they ?

Thanks

I feel this is going to end like LLL.us , that`s my concern , I still have some LLL.in but I`m just looking at reality, I had 8 premium ones and without NamePros I was struggling to sell them
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Will be interesting to see how the .in registry manages pricing in the future and how that affects renewals. Get the sense that the promo pricing may continue to be extended indefinitely - but who knows.
 
0
•••
italiandragon said:
I know that, but that`s indeed because Indian prefer .com or .co.in

Plus, I doubt those ones you sold so far were containing Z and Q or Q and J , were they ?

Thanks

I feel this is going to end like LLL.us , that`s my concern , I still have some LLL.in but I`m just looking at reality, I had 8 premium ones and without NamePros I was struggling to sell them

Some of them i sold to peoples in Germany had Z in them.
 
0
•••
The majority of my sales are to non forum buyers, and those tend to be higher in price. Also, i have several developed keyword.in names that make $100s per month in revenue each.
 
0
•••
johnnywj said:
Some of them i sold to peoples in Germany had Z in them.

I know...German love the Z :) but not Z and Q in the same name?

These last have 2 bad letters in them, I`ll rather buy premium ones from other reseller at this stage.

But that`s just my opinion. :)
 
0
•••
italiandragon said:
I know...German love the Z :) but not Z and Q in the same name?

These last have 2 bad letters in them, I`ll rather buy premium ones from other reseller at this stage.

But that`s just my opinion. :)

I have not sold any with Z and Q in the same name.
 
0
•••
were all sales lll only

and if you don't mind to disclose the price range
 
0
•••
leede said:
were all sales lll only

and if you don't mind to disclose the price range

I have sold other .IN domains also but prices i have got
for my LLL.IN have been between $150 to $1700 each
from end users.

I have had a $14700 offer on one of my LLL.IN but the
reason for this offer is that this name is getting between
$300 to $800 in revenue month.
 
0
•••
wow good job man
 
0
•••
johnnywj said:
....

I have had a $14700 offer on one of my LLL.IN but the
reason for this offer is that this name is getting between
$300 to $800 in revenue month.

Wow now that is a nice suplementary income if you ask me.
 
0
•••
Tivo said:
Wow now that is a nice suplementary income if you ask me.

I have 3 more LLL.IN that are getting good revenue each month also.
 
0
•••
congrats johnny - i have one making around $200/month - and rising. just last summer it wasn't even at $1/day. .in traffic is only going to go up.
 
0
•••
Are these sites or are they parked? If you dont mind sharing...
 
0
•••
Tivo said:
Are these sites or are they parked? If you dont mind sharing...
They are parked.
 
0
•••
yes for me too

last month i got 350 unique visitor the whole month and in this 4 days i have got 283 visitors
 
0
•••
Great stats. I wish i had one of them. I get decent revenue but not over $100 from a single name in a month. Has been picking up lately though.
 
0
•••
I just recently sold 4 names for $800 at 3.5 years revenue. One of the members of NP and INF can confirm this sale. (they were LLL's)
 
0
•••
italiandragon said:
I feel this is going to end like LLL.us , that`s my concern , I still have some LLL.in but I`m just looking at reality, I had 8 premium ones and without NamePros I was struggling to sell them

Personally I wouldn't be upset with a $60 return for a $3 investment!

List without "Q" or "X" here:

JVZ.IN
JWZ.IN
JYZ.IN
JZB.IN
JZC.IN
JZD.IN
JZE.IN
JZF.IN
JZG.IN
JZH.IN
JZK.IN
JZL.IN
JZM.IN
JZN.IN
JZT.IN
JZV.IN
UJZ.IN
UVZ.IN
UYZ.IN
UZC.IN
UZF.IN
UZG.IN
UZJ.IN
UZK.IN
UZL.IN
UZN.IN
UZT.IN
UZV.IN
UZW.IN
VCZ.IN
VJZ.IN
VWZ.IN
VZB.IN
VZC.IN
VZD.IN
VZF.IN
VZH.IN
VZJ.IN
VZR.IN
VZS.IN
WCZ.IN
WFZ.IN
WGZ.IN
WKZ.IN
WPZ.IN
WSZ.IN
WVZ.IN
WZF.IN
WZG.IN
WZH.IN
WZK.IN
WZM.IN
WZN.IN
WZP.IN
WZR.IN
WZS.IN
WZT.IN
WZU.IN
WZV.IN
WZY.IN
YCZ.IN
YDZ.IN
YGZ.IN
YHZ.IN
YJZ.IN
YKJ.IN
YKZ.IN
YLZ.IN
YMZ.IN
YNZ.IN
YPZ.IN
YSZ.IN
YVZ.IN
YWZ.IN
YZB.IN
YZC.IN
YZD.IN
YZG.IN
YZH.IN
YZJ.IN
YZK.IN
YZL.IN
YZM.IN
YZN.IN
YZP.IN
YZR.IN
YZS.IN
YZT.IN
YZV.IN
YZW.IN
ZBJ.IN
ZBK.IN
ZCJ.IN
ZCK.IN
ZCV.IN
ZCW.IN
ZCY.IN
ZDV.IN
ZDW.IN
ZDY.IN
ZFJ.IN
ZFK.IN
ZFV.IN
ZFW.IN
ZFY.IN
ZGJ.IN
ZGK.IN
ZGV.IN
ZGW.IN
ZHJ.IN
ZHK.IN
ZHV.IN
ZJA.IN
ZJB.IN
ZJC.IN
ZJD.IN
ZJE.IN
ZJF.IN
ZJH.IN
ZJL.IN
ZJM.IN
ZJN.IN
ZJP.IN
ZJR.IN
ZJS.IN
ZJT.IN
ZJU.IN
ZJV.IN
ZJY.IN
ZKA.IN
ZKC.IN
ZKD.IN
ZKE.IN
ZKF.IN
ZKG.IN
ZKH.IN
ZKJ.IN
ZKL.IN
ZKN.IN
ZKP.IN
ZKR.IN
ZKS.IN
ZKU.IN
ZKV.IN
ZLJ.IN
ZLK.IN
ZLW.IN
ZMJ.IN
ZMW.IN
ZNJ.IN
ZNV.IN
ZNW.IN
ZPJ.IN
ZPK.IN
ZPU.IN
ZPV.IN
ZWH.IN
 
0
•••
Passed the 95% registered mark.
16824 LLL.in registered.
752 LLL.in remaining.

(note: does not account for tasting)
 
0
•••
Which place allow people taste .in names?
I think it is an excellent and rare opportunity to invest in these remaing lll.in. I believe that all of them would be registered by next Monday or within 10 days.
 
0
•••
Status
Not open for further replies.
CatchedCatched
Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy โ€” Live Options
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back