Well, I don't want to generalize with the .me, but just note that the names you mentioned above only hugg.me is developed and not the others which in my opinion is a signal that the .me don't go too well with those or nor ideal at all
Let me first say, thank you for your appraisal; however, I'm not quite sure what point you are trying to make here.
..if some people pay "high amounts" for domains that you think "dont fit" - then maybe they do fit but you just dont see they do... or they are all plain wrong?![]()
all names i asked you about if they fit .me better than "junk" were sold on sedo recently (and many more) well above $1,000.
you dont need to repeat over and over that any domain is better in .com - we all already know that.
i was trying to figure out why you think "junk" is a worse fit compared to other (sold) .me names, not why it's less valuable than .com or .net
thank you
*
Comparable Sales:
Junk.net sold for $3,800 in December of 2008 and sold again for $4,000 in April of 2009.
Junk.us sold for $1,595 in November 2005 and sold again for $1,395 in August of 2011.
I'd say it's worth as high as $1,250 to an enduser, and under $500 to another domainer.




