Unstoppable Domains — Expired Auctions

domains It's so weird ,Seems that the one person did the same thing,Scheme?

Spacemail by SpaceshipSpacemail by Spaceship
Watch

domainnews

domaining story-tellerTop Member
Impact
1,176
I recently found that the extension,some .Us.com domains sold are at the same figures at Namecheap and these domains registered at same day and they are not be renewed at the same time although has expired 1 month and 2 days as well.

I checked more infos found that most of .us.com sales come from Namecheap , just attached some of them screenshots below.

I'm wondering why domainers prefer spending 1010 USD on them while not renew them or she or he is thinking of renewing or not?

I will track these sales further to see what's happening with these domains.

The yellow mark means these domains has not be renewed.


Screenshot_20250907_011653.jpg
Screenshot_20250907_012553.jpg
Screenshot_20250907_012611.jpg
Screenshot_20250907_012621.jpg


Screenshot_20250907_011120.jpg
 
Last edited:
2
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
I am skeptical of these reported sales.

Most of these domains would not even sell for these prices in .US, never mind some crappy subdomain "extension" that has basically no demand.

The fact they all sold the same day at the same price = red flags.

Brad
 
5
•••
I am skeptical of these reported sales.

Most of these domains would not even sell for these prices in .US, never mind some crappy subdomain "extension" that has basically no demand.

The fact they all sold the same day at the same price = red flags.

Brad
You are totally right ,Brad,I will continue to track these domains to see if they are renewed or not in the end.

We all namepros members here shall join hands to crack down severely and disclose or report the fake news and sales here for the sake of healthy domaining.
 
1
•••
Agreed..... When I do in-depth appraisals/evaluations and see repetition in time/date + exact amount + it's followed by them all still being parked or landed in the same portfolio or marketplace platform 30+ days later with no indication of hobbyist or end user interest (Coming soon page, under construction page, email lead capture to be notified of launch, place holder business branded mini-site up, etc..), it sends the red flags up the pole and eludes to a potentially hyped (manipulated) market segment.

Alternately, it's just resellers passing a hot potato to see who gets stuck with it when it cools off. But those types have different indicators than a manipulated market segment.

Unfortunately, there are many cases where 1 or a team of larger portfolio holders may sweep up a specific niche combination on an obscure or unpopular extension to manipulate the floor value when the door closes on combination possibilities.

A proverbial forced monopoly of just a few key players (1 to 10), rather than an open market of 100+ stake holders.

That's my thoughts anyways.
 
4
•••
Yes ,You are obsolutely right ,Eric!


First, based on my research on the platform's data, the data it publishes should only be used as a reference and should never be relied upon as investment advice or a basis for investments. Even the platform publishers often lack understanding or clarity as to whether the data they publish is authentic, accurate, and professional.

Furthermore, certain signs indicate that there are undoubtedly promoters and manipulators behind this. Their fundamental goal is to create a false market boom.

While the platform is merely a marketing tool and information distribution channel for these manipulators. Furthermore, to a large extent, the platform receives promotional fees and is also a participant. In other words, the platform uses data to attract more domainers in.

Because, after continuous fake propaganda, the market has gradually become more active, with new entrants and new transactions constantly appearing. It's possible that, after being bombarded with news from domain media platforms, many domain holders, unaware of the underlying operations, were attracted and joined, leading to the possibility of real transactions.

However, actual transactions are not too many. Nevertheless, the manipulators' marketing tactics have been effective, and their goal has been achieved.

The underlying macroeconomic dynamics behind these large transactions require a closer look. Domains are used to build websites, not as collectibles. The current global economy is in a period of uncertainty and instability. Massive corporates layoffs ,and layoffs means the closure of thousands of small and startup businesses each and every single day, further exacerbating the decline in demand for domain names. ,on the other hand,I've personally experienced this, exemplified by the current challenges facing China, the world's second-largest market.

In essence, many large domain name transactions are like buying stocks. They are backed by major shareholders, or capitalists.

The story of prosperity stems from these major shareholders, attracting more participants. These capitalists can control and manipulate stock prices. Ultimately, when prices peak, major shareholders gradually sell off their holdings and exit the market, transferring market risk to participants with weaker risk tolerance.

Domains speculation are very similar to stocks, art, and other similar activities. The only difference is that the stock market is vast, and art has collectible value, while the value of a domain name lies in its use. Without use, it's just a string of letters, lacking market value. Having experienced cases of price manipulation in the past, I'm very sensitive to these manipulations.
 
2
•••
First, based on my research on the platform's data, the data it publishes should only be used as a reference and should never be relied upon as investment advice or a basis for investments. Even the platform publishers often lack understanding or clarity as to whether the data they publish is authentic, accurate, and professional.
That's why NameBio has this disclaimer on the website:

Disclaimer

Sales data is believed to be correct, though its accuracy is not guaranteed. Please do your own due diligence before investing.
 
4
•••
That's why NameBio has this disclaimer on the website:

Disclaimer

Sales data is believed to be correct, though its accuracy is not guaranteed. Please do your own due diligence before investing.
Could you please share or explain to us what constitute news is?

My understanding of news is authenticity, accuracy, and fairness. If a platform simply states that information is for reference only, then that information becomes news. That information is the platform's property or right and the platform shall be responsible for any consequences caused.

However, this is a domain forum; ownership does not rest with the domain data platform. Furthermore, each of his posts lacks any warnings or cautionary tales or marks. Clearly, he must have confident and sufficient evidence ,Grounds and theoretical support for the information he published here.

Instead,If the accuracy and authenticity of the information published here are uncertain, I don't consider it is news. Sorry, it's simply propaganda, and therefore, his posts has posted in the wrong place or sectors.
 
0
•••
I personally don't really feel like getting into this discussion. Good luck though!
 
0
•••
0
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer
Appraise.net

We're social

Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Payment Flexibility
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back