Is TinyImages.com handy collection?

[Ber|Art]

Hi I am busy making a site for Tiny and Small images, I am planning to put the site behind a Member system but was wondering if you think that there are people who would benefit from this collection of more than 6000 small images.

I do not want a real site check design wise yet

You can see the site at: www.tinyimages.com

Thanks a lot :hearts:

 

[StudioWorks]

No problem! Let us know if you make any changes to it! :wave:

 

[Ber|Art]

Ill will!

 

[StudioWorks]

Great! :kickass:

 

[Killmur]

Nice idea and layout. You need to fix it so that the images load faster on slower machines.

 

[Ber|Art]

I am going to I will make some more pages, so that it will load quicker, Thx for the tip

Nice idea and layout

I have some more designs like this, see www.searchrelationships.com

 

[Killmur]

Your welcome.

 

[bhyraj]

good animation I like it. :wave:

 

[snareklutz]

The design is fine, but it takes too long to load all those images. Either a faster host, or smalll file sizes.

 

[Ber|Art]

The design is fine, but it takes too long to load all those images. Either a faster host, or smalll file sizes.

Hihi, I am the host I have my own ISP company, and do not forget that my servers are in the Netherlands, so they might have a higer pingtime and a little more hops but I devided the page in two now! Should be a bit faster now. There where more than 300 images on the page, that was the reason, the biggest image size are the banners

 

[StudioWorks]

Loads faster for me now.. great!

 

[snareklutz]

Pinging www.tinyimages.com [83.149.95.50] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 83.149.95.50: bytes=32 time=943ms TTL=50
Reply from 83.149.95.50: bytes=32 time=953ms TTL=50
Reply from 83.149.95.50: bytes=32 time=950ms TTL=50
Reply from 83.149.95.50: bytes=32 time=958ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 83.149.95.50:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 943ms, Maximum = 958ms, Average = 951ms

That's pretty bad.

 

[Ber|Art]

Ping

Loads faster for me now.. great!

Thx! I made a second one on www.smallimages.net

Ping statistics for 83.149.95.50:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 943ms, Maximum = 958ms, Average = 951ms

That's pretty bad.

Pinging from my laptop in the Netherlands:

C:\>ping 83.149.95.50
Pinging 83.149.95.50 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 83.149.95.50: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=58
Reply from 83.149.95.50: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=58
Reply from 83.149.95.50: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=58
Reply from 83.149.95.50: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 83.149.95.50:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 10ms, Maximum = 25ms, Average = 14ms

As I said I am in the Netherlands I gues 14ms is NOT that bad

 

[thetzfreak]

Wow, the home page is HUGE. Anyway, it's good. You also might want to double check the links... i clicked on a few and some were down or broken.

Good job!

 

[Ber|Art]

Thx! I will dubble check I saw this too , some are old, anyway the images are the most important, maybe I will buy a USA shared hosting package so the speeds of the pages are a bit better for you

 

[Killmur]

Yea it still loads slow for me. Hell it loads slow on both sites.

 

[Ber|Art]

OK, what are the "Good" hosters in the USA? Is there a list of professional webhosters I can look at? I have tinyicons.net left to use