Unstoppable Domains — AI Assistant

Interesting article on domain security

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Gerrit

Established Member
Impact
30
Found this on domaining.com and thought this article was pretty interesting. I copy-pasted it from that site, so I am just the messenger, not the author :hehe:




With domain hijackings seemingly at an all time high, I think now is the time for a public domain registrar to take action. I believe security key fobs are a nearly impenetrable line of defense that should be put into action by a responsible registrar. This would curtail domain hijackings, potentially saving registrants thousands of dollars in legal fees and hundreds of hours fighting to have their domain names returned.

Domain hijackings can occur when a hacker gains access to a person’s domain registrar account. This can be done by hacking into someone’s email account using a variety of methods or by hacking into the actual domain account. Either a weak password or a multitude of other factors can potentially lead to this outcome. Once a hacker is in possession of the registrar account, there are many ways he can control the domain names without raising the attention of the domain owner. If the domain names are transferred to another registrar, it may be too late for the rightful owner to take action, and the process of getting the domain names returned can be costly and time consuming.

Domain names are intangible assets, and the loss of one can be fatal to a business. It can mean missed sales, lost emails sent to addresses linked to the domain name, confused customers, and it can be emotionally draining on the registrant. While we are able to secure our tangible assets such as jewelry or property deeds, it is more difficult to secure our domain assets. For example, if I lose the key to my safety deposit box, the bank doesn’t simply permit the finder to access the box. As it currently stands in the domain business, if a hacker gains access to my domain account though unscrupulous actions, he may be able to take control of my domain names. I don’t think its fair to be held accountable for something that may be out of my control.

With that said, I think a security key fob with a changing passcode (similar to what Paypal offers) could help secure a domain registrar account. I would pay a premium for this service, and I am sure others would as well. Having good security is a unique selling point that distinguishes some registrars from others. Having the best security system in place before competitors would certainly give one registrar a major competitive advantage. Most registrants wouldn’t want multiple security key fobs, so consolidating all domain names at the most secure registrar would be the most likely outcome.

I urge all registrars to take action, no matter how secure you believe your system is.





Now I personally did often in the history of this forum state that I would find it much more secure if ownership transfers could only be done by paperworks needing to be signed by the domain owner and then faxed to the registrar. That way getting access to someone's email account is not enough to steal a domainname, because to complete the transfer the owner needs to put an actual signature on a paper.

On domaining.com a poll showed that 78% of the people who read the article, stated they were willing to pay extra for extra security features.

I wonder, is there really no registrar out there (a reliable registrar) who still requires paperwork before a domain can be transfered? Even if it were only optional, that the domain owner can choose if he wants to have paperworks involved or not... I am quite sure there would be more people interested in it, as obviously more domainers care about security.
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
I think it should be a requirement to have some other way of identifying a domain owner besides just email which should just be the first method. I'm not sure what but they definitely need to work on something soon.
 
0
•••
Link to article, pretty please? :)
 
0
•••
The article was copy-pasted from www.elliottsblog.com and the full article also appeared on www.domaining.com . On elliottsblog.com, you can find the email address of the person who wrote the article.


@ onewordonly : I too think there should be done more than just sending an email that needs to be authorised by the domain owner. OK, ownership transfers would take more time if paperworks and proof of identity are involved, but I think that is just a small disadvantage that cannot overpower the many advantages that extra security brings.

Is there really no registrar that uses paperworks or identity controls for ownership transfers? (apart from .co.uk where paperworks are required in any case, however there must be some registrar doing it for gTLD's as well??)
 
0
•••
I agree with this article. and I won't mind paying a little extra for these good security features.

However I would only use the signature thing if I had a domain like poker.com, or LL.coms.

If its just long-dash-domain.info, then its not worth the hassle.
 
0
•••
I would do it for any domain really, safety is more important than time for me so I don't care if a transfer takes a few faxes to send...

Afternic.nl used to use paperworks for every transfer, I am not sure if they still do and how reliable they are. If they are trustworthy and still apply paperworks for transfers, then I won't hesitate buying domains there.
 
0
•••
Domaining.com aggregates articles from other sites, which is fine but you should always try to post the link of the actual author's website. Elliotsblog.com is a great domaining blog, by the way. It's a must-read for every domainer.
 
0
•••
Gerrit said:
Is there really no registrar that uses paperworks or identity controls for ownership transfers?
I vaguely (or mistakenly) recall reading somewhere 1&1 does that. Of course,
that might have changed since then.

There's probably not enough market demand for security via paperwork.
 
0
•••
do you mean the UK based 1&1 ?
 
0
•••
Getting an old topic out of the closet, but united-domains.de require paperworks for every transfer or change of domain owner. Which is one of the reasons why I do like that registrar, the paperworks form an extra barrier/frontier for those intending domain theft.
 
0
•••
OVH (France) also requires paperworks for a change of domain owner.

I experience this even for domains I buy at Sedo. According to the French-speaking contact I have with Sedo, changing the name of the owner (I mean replacing "Sedo" by the name of the buyer, which sounds only normal and logical at the end of the transfer) is automatic and easier with other registrars. But, no way, with OVH you *must* provide a form signed by Sedo and by yourself. And have it *posted*, not faxed.
 
0
•••
I think as it is - it is backward

For instance - lets take NetSol saying as they think they are so secure


When someone starts a transfer from another register for a domain at Netsol they send you an email saying

If you would like to proceed with this transfer you do not need to respond to this message.

...If we do not hear from you by February 5, 2008 7:59:04 PM EST, this transfer will proceed.



IMO they should be asking you to CONFIRM YOU WANT TO TRANSFER OUT, after all - they are the ones that need to release it at the true owners request, and not at the request of someone they don't even know.

...does that make any sense ?


Another major problem now is DT registrant search - it makes it so easy for crooks to find out who best to target. Pay a few dollars and they can see all your names and pick the best ones :td:

....it's going to get alot worse before it gets any better - JMO


.
 
0
•••
Dave Zan said:
I vaguely (or mistakenly) recall reading somewhere 1&1 does that. Of course,
that might have changed since then.

There's probably not enough market demand for security via paperwork.


:hi:

1and1 used to require faxing documents when changing ownership but
they no longer do.

Patrick

Gerrit said:
Getting an old topic out of the closet, but united-domains.de require paperworks for every transfer or change of domain owner. Which is one of the reasons why I do like that registrar, the paperworks form an extra barrier/frontier for those intending domain theft.


:hi:

For what it's worth when Sex.com was originally stolen ,paperwork was used.

Moniker.com and Fabulous.com have both introduced additional security
measures for their domain holders.

Patrick
 
0
•••
Gerrit said:
Is there really no registrar that uses paperworks or identity controls for ownership transfers? (apart from .co.uk where paperworks are required in any case, however there must be some registrar doing it for gTLD's as well??)

for .co.uk you pay Nominet £11.75 to process the transfer.

As a result it is very secure as it is manually checked, and the great thing is they are able to roll back any changes if required.

I am not aware of a domain name being hijacked in the .UK space :hehe:
 
0
•••
Gerrit said:
The article was copy-pasted from www.elliottsblog.com and the full article also appeared on www.domaining.com . On elliottsblog.com, you can find the email address of the person who wrote the article.

Thanks for the compliments. I wrote the article, and I hope a registrar comes out with a security fob in 2008. I think there is at least one registrar working on this.
 
0
•••

We're social

Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Live Options
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back