Image in signature ?

[rome2ng]

hi guys,

recently, i have a software that allow me to generate userbar as the signature. i thought that i may want to get this userbar for my acc at namepros.

here's the image


YET, namepros don't seem to allow image in the userbar , despite they put up this msg,

may not contain images

Maybe Namepros should consider allowing user to put up such small file image ? thks

 

[Hitch]

I used to think images was good in signatures.

Now, after a year of seeing no images on NamePros and my own forum, i get used to it.
If i go onto a forum with signature images, it just hits me, how messy the forum looks.

To me, i don't think image signatures really matter, also, the page would load quicker without.

Adrian

 

[rome2ng]

ha, i know

but maybe namepros can add this to the signature condition.

Signatures should be no more than four lines in length and may not contain images no or font sizes larger than SIZE 2.


isnt this better and make the forum loads faster ?

 

[jeter4982]

ha, i know

but maybe namepros can add this to the signature condition.

Signatures should be no more than four lines in length and may not contain images no or font sizes larger than SIZE 2.


isnt this better and make the forum loads faster ?

No, because the image is still going to take longer to load then four small lines of text. And also it is not just one image per page. If the rule were changed and most members added images to their signatures then to browse a thread you would have to wait for 15 different images to load, and its just not worth it IMHO.

Tom

 

[SpareDomains]

problem is even if the images are small if the thread has tons of posts you will need to wait for each image to load, I sometimes get "server is too busy" now so adding on something else to slow things down can't be good, I prefer the good old text links.

 

[robertjr]

I'm with Jay and micro on this one.
Besides, it would make NP load even slower on my Treo. We can't have that, can we??? :gl:

 

[SpareDomains]

I'm with Jay and micro on this one.
Besides, it would make NP load even slower on my Treo. We can't have that, can we??? :gl:

hmmm... maybe it's not a bad idea after all, might slow down or disable the NPSniper™ :hehe:

 

[robertjr]

:p
Ordering T1 connection....

 

[True_Snake]

No, because the image is still going to take longer to load then four small lines of text. And also it is not just one image per page. If the rule were changed and most members added images to their signatures then to browse a thread you would have to wait for 15 different images to load, and its just not worth it IMHO.

Tom

:bingo:

This had been discussed before too, and we came to the same reasoning :tu: .

But it doesn't hurt to suggest, does it :gl: ?

Thanks!
True_Snake

 

[rome2ng]

yup,

thks everyone for the feedback though.

it will be great to allow image though

maybe we wait till the next server upgrades comes ? ha