events I AM LAMBO

[lambo.com]

Hello frens,

I AM LAMBO of LAMBO.com and I will defend, defeat and humiliate those endeavouring to steal any of my domain name brands - including my moniker.

We have stood by in meek positioning watching poor decisions, one after another, rendered typically by "SOLE PANELISTS" - albeit with exceptions and inconsistency.

Digital assets stripped from legal holders and registrants who immediately (apparently), default to defensive posturing against Reverse Domain Name Hijackers (RDNH).

The injustice propagated against domain investors, speculators and BUILDERS - will not continue as it has.

In my case, a car company called "Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A." is attempting THEFT of my asset, nomenclature and taxonomy they possess ZERO rights to.

https://www.udrpsearch.com/wipo/d2022-1570

Counter measures to humiliate such endeavours are afoot. Unlawful theft will be duly punished through legal and commensurate counter efforts including any coerced and submissive accomplices.

Humiliation is inevitable should they desire METAWAR, even as the car company, NISSAN, found out with NISSAN.com
https://web.archive.org/web/20200131113518/https://www.nissan.com/

This is enough for now, I will continue to update as necessary.

In the meanwhile, you can add me on lichess (@lamboDOTcom).

We will save our industry from the filth that seeks to dismember it's legitimacy.

Thank you for time and God Bless. May the VRIL be with you.

 

[Altetra]

Are you insane? Rebranding?

No, but their brand is crap!

 

[timestamp]

P.s. what a stupid brand name for car is Lamborghini, I have better names and better suited for cars and other tech.

I think you are. Did you offer your rebranding services to other car companies? The ones based on a surname.

 

[Altetra]

I think you are. Did you offer your rebranding services to other car companies? The ones based on a surname.

I would say as you, but I have solid reasons to do this and yes I have contacted more s***t of car brands, even non car related crap of brands.

 

[anunt]

iTesla is responsible for changing Google to Alphabet and Facebook to Meta and now is working on changing Lamborghini and Apple to one of his domains.

 

[Altetra]

iTesla is responsible for changing Google to Alphabet and Facebook to Meta and now is working on changing Lamborghini and Apple to one of his domains.

No, i do not care much, they will implore me to sell those domains to them, but we will see soon in the years to come.
Anyway my car brands are more targeted to new startups and I hope they will be able to overthrow such companies from their mighty pedestal.

 

[love4ever]

.​

 

[lambo.com]

 

[Name Trader]

Ding.... Round Two. I wish you better luck this time. I personally I have no understanding of the law other than you are allowed to bring this case. Better luck the second time around.

 

[lambo.com]

Ankur Raheja @ankurraheja August 29, 2022

The dissenting opinion in this matter says it all: The LAMBO mark is the Complainant’s orphan child, not in practical use... Lambo mark already abandoned in US. The Domain Name is the property of the Respondent and his ownership should be respected. Read: internetcommerce.org/udrp-case-summ…

View original Load full embed

 

[timestamp]

Lambo as a nickname should have died in UDRP process, never to be mentioned again.

How you got that nickname?

Well, when I was just a kid, I always wanted to get a Lambo, and I told my friends that, and... Uhmm, I cannot say that. Dang it!

Well, as a kid I spent my summer holidays at my grandparents coutryside house, where I looked after sheep. I told my friends that, and they suddenly started chanting: Lambo!... Lambo!... Lambo!

$50 million price. You showed other potential end users that can use lambo, but can you show us the one that can pay that much? Or is it just car company?

Let's assume acquisition price is $100k. Would you sell it to the wool products company for $250k? I don't think so. In the back of your mind you'll be like: man, I think Lamborghini would pay at least $1M.

 

[Mize]

I mentioned this before but will word it a little differently in hopes that someone can point out a weakness:

For domains in general:

If the complainant never existed, is it reasonable to believe that the domain has value to at least one other party?

If the answer to that question is yes, then the complainant is in line for a desirable domain (trademark is irrelevant if not being infringed upon).

Is there any weakness in the above? I feel this needs to be discussed.

 

[Mize]

For domains in general:

If the complainant never existed, is it reasonable to believe that the domain has value to at least one other party?

If the answer to that question is yes, then the complainant is in line for a desirable domain (trademark is irrelevant if not being infringed upon).

What would be a good name for this rule that could help trademark owners more easily understand when they should or should not start a UDRP?

Multiple Potential Buyers Rule?
More than One Potential Buyer Rule?

 

[lambo.com]

What would be a good name for this rule that could help trademark owners more easily understand when they should or should not start a UDRP?

Multiple Potential Buyers Rule?
More than One Potential Buyer Rule?

Multiple Potential Buyers Rule (MPBR)

https://opencorporates.com/companies?jurisdiction_code=&q=Lambo&utf8=✓

 

[AEProgram]

Multiple Potential Buyers Rule (MPBR)

Show attachment 223384

https://opencorporates.com/companies?jurisdiction_code=&q=Lambo&utf8=✓

there are also many trademarks with the word Lambo in them that has nothing to do with them.

One is called Lambo and it was registered about a year ago and offers communications services. Another is also called Just Lambo and it was registered in 2019 and it is related to beard clippers.

 

[Mize]

Two more rules up for discussion/point out any weaknesses/naming of the rule. Note: I’m not a lawyer, this is not legal advice…this is a discussion.

-----------------------------------------------------

Price rule. The future price a buyer is willing to pay is not known. Offer price is at the discretion of the seller. Domain may never be sold.

For domains which have sold at the highest prices: is one able to 1. Know who the buyer would be before it was sold 2. Know the price the domain would sell for 3. Know the price the buyer was willing to pay 4. Know the highest price another potential buyer would pay 5. Know if a company will be created tomorrow who would also want the domain.

--------------------------------------------------

Offering to Sale Rule: If the Multiple Potential Buyers Rule is valid and in effect (along with any trademarks are not being infringed upon), Offering the domain for sale to as many potential buyers as possible or only to one is at the discretion of the seller. Assumption is made that any potential buyers would want to know if the domain is for sale rather than not knowing.

-----------------------------------------------------

Moral of the story:

You don’t know who will buy a domain

You don’t know at what price a future buyer is willing to pay

If I am a potential buyer of a domain, I want it offered to me before it is sold to someone else.

If you want a domain, buy it if you can before another potential buyer buys it.

That’s normally what a current registrant has done.



discussion/corrections/weaknesses welcome

 

[monotheist]

Hello frens,

I AM LAMBO of LAMBO.com and I will defend, defeat and humiliate those endeavouring to steal any of my domain name brands - including my moniker.

We have stood by in meek positioning watching poor decisions, one after another, rendered typically by "SOLE PANELISTS" - albeit with exceptions and inconsistency.

Digital assets stripped from legal holders and registrants who immediately (apparently), default to defensive posturing against Reverse Domain Name Hijackers (RDNH).

The injustice propagated against domain investors, speculators and BUILDERS - will not continue as it has.

In my case, a car company called "Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A." is attempting THEFT of my asset, nomenclature and taxonomy they possess ZERO rights to.

https://www.udrpsearch.com/wipo/d2022-1570

Counter measures to humiliate such endeavours are afoot. Unlawful theft will be duly punished through legal and commensurate counter efforts including any coerced and submissive accomplices.

Humiliation is inevitable should they desire METAWAR, even as the car company, NISSAN, found out with NISSAN.com
https://web.archive.org/web/20200131113518/https://www.nissan.com/

This is enough for now, I will continue to update as necessary.

In the meanwhile, you can add me on lichess (@lamboDOTcom).

We will save our industry from the filth that seeks to dismember it's legitimacy.

Thank you for time and God Bless. May the VRIL be with you.

Show attachment 215370

This simply means god is not on your side. Accept your destiny and move on. You will get what you are destined for

 

[Centauri]

lambo,
enlighten us:
what has happened in the end?!

I saw, you listed your domain for....

$50,000,000?!

So, automobili lamborghini have not been able to catch it from you?!


Regards

 

[lambo.com]

lambo,
enlighten us:
what has happened in the end?!

I saw, you listed your domain for....

$50,000,000?!

So, automobili lamborghini have not been able to catch it from you?!


Regards

Hello, there is an ongoing legal matter to ensure I am the Admiral as I AM LAMBO.

 

[lambo.com]

Multiple Potential Buyers Rule (MPBR)

Show attachment 223384

https://opencorporates.com/companies?jurisdiction_code=&q=Lambo&utf8=✓

+37

 

[Jv1999]

I read the firstr page and thought lambo would win... and then i realized the first page is a year old, so i skipped to the last page... and found out lambo lost... wow... this is so sad.

It actaully depends on when Lambo acquired the domain name, tbh.