domain googledr.com

[admts905]

please appraise

Thanks
Daniel

 

[ddaybofb]

huge trademark

reg fee

 

[weblord]

it has some listing on msn btw

 

[DN BROKER]

Value $0

TRADEMARK

 

[Idees]

Everyone else is right, no true domainer would buy this.

Worth $0

 

[holyroller]

Everyone else is right, no true domainer would buy this.

Worth $0

Unfortunately I would have to agree, google is such a big name and will actively protect there TM.

The name itself I actually quite Like Google Doctor, would would make a nice name for an SEO site, or a site about using adsense and adwords.

I suppose the only real hope on the TM issue is to develop a site on improving your appearance, i.e. making yourself look good so people will google at you, etc.. Even then, in a dispute they still might win.

 

[admts905]

Thank you very much to all your honest opinion.
i was fallowing yesterday a big biding for: GoogleOrder.com
and it end up at $56.80

Thanks again
Daniel

 

[admts905]

Bump

 

[newsiness]

$0

 

[CoolCode]

i really like the name. could fit a a seo, adwords, adsence agency; blog; forum nicely into it
All good stuff, except for TM probs so in a domainers point of view its a Zero $

 

[admts905]

Thanks again

 

[admts905]

Single Use of Trademark May Be Okay On April 30, 2008, a Federal District Court in New Jersey held that By Alex Athans, Legal Team

On April 30, 2008, a Federal District Court in New Jersey held that a trademarked term placed in a single meta tag constitutes fair use, and therefore does not infringe upon that trademark.

In Syncsort, Inc. v. Innovative Routines International, Inc., the plaintiff Syncsort, a UNIX sorting software manufacturer, sued Innovative Routines, another UNIX sorting software manufacturer, for using the plaintiff’s trademarked term “syncsort” in a meta tag on the defendant’s website. The defendant used the plaintiff’s term because their program is able to translate the plaintiff’s syncsort language into its own.

The judge found that the defendant’s actions were not likely to cause consumer confusion because a user viewing the plaintiff’s mark on the defendant’s website would not be likely to confuse the source of the defendant’s product with the plaintiff. Further, the defendant met all three fair use factors: their use of the term “syncsoft” was necessary to describe their own translation capabilities, they made only one use of the plaintiff’s mark, and their website made no claim of being affiliated with the plaintiff. This finding of fair use led the court to dismiss the plaintiff’s allegation of trademark infringement, and was based on a 2005 Third Circuit case that delineated these factors.

Domain owners should be aware that their use of a trademarked term may constitute a fair use of that term, if it meets the narrow requirements of being necessary to describe the product or service, is used in a limited fashion only to describe the trademark owner’s or their own product, and that they do not mischaracterize the relationship between themselves and the trademark holder. Additionally, a domain owner must also be aware of whether the use of a trademarked term is likely to cause customer confusion.

 

[holyroller]

Single Use of Trademark May Be Okay On April 30, 2008, a Federal District Court in New Jersey held that By Alex Athans, Legal Team

On April 30, 2008, a Federal District Court in New Jersey held that a trademarked term placed in a single meta tag constitutes fair use, and therefore does not infringe upon that trademark.

thats why the <TM>sucks . com often wins against the TM. Its best not to park domains with TM issues, also its best to be careful what you post as well. The TM holder has to prove the following three things.

1. The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights.

2. The respondent has no right or legitimate interest in respect of the disputed domain name.

3. The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.

 

[admts905]

Thanks for giving me your point of view.

 

[admts905]

Bump