Dynadot โ€” .com Transfer

Federal Court Rules For Descriptive Domains

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

blueline7

Account Closed (Disallowed)
Impact
3
Further to Patrick's thread, for which I thank him, and Frank Schilling's Blog comments, for which I thank him too, I was the attorney who succesffuly represented the owner of cheaptickets.ca

Below is the press release which details the story. You can also read the decision at DNattorney.com.

Zak Muscovitch

TORONTO, March 9 /CNW/ - The Federal Court of Canada has ruled that
everyone has the right to sell "Cheap Tickets". In ruling that two registered
trademarks, "Cheap Tickets" and "Cheap Tickets and Travel", should be struck
from the trademarks registry, The Honourable Justice Barry Strayer decided
that no one should have the monopoly over describing their tickets as "cheap".
Montreal-based Internet developer, Emall.ca Inc., had taken
Victoria-based travel agency, Cheap Tickets and Travel Inc. to Federal Court
to strike its registered trademarks. The lawsuit was in response to the travel
agency's previous attempts to force Emall.ca Inc. to turn over its domain
name, CheapTickets.ca. The travel agency had unsuccessfully complained to the
Canadian Internet Registration Authority, and then sued Emall.ca Inc. for
trademark infringement in British Columbia.
Peter Maxymych, the President of Emall.ca Inc. said, "This is a victory
for every business person in Canada. Everyone should have the right to
accurately describe what they are offering. I am thankful that the Judge
agreed and ordered that the travel agency's trademarks be struck from the
registry so that it does not enjoy an unfair monopoly."
In his written decision released this week, Justice Strayer said that the
travel agency admitted that it used "Cheap Tickets" and "Cheap Tickets and
Travel" descriptively of the services that it provided, and that, "In effect
these combinations are withdrawn from use in the commercial world in Canada by
anyone other than the Respondent. I do not believe this should be permitted
because I am satisfied that these trademarks are clearly descriptive."
Harold Simpkins, Vice-President of Marketing at Emall.ca Inc., and a
Professor of Marketing at Concordia University, said "Of course everyone has
the right to describe the good or services that they are selling. It would
turn the commercial world on its head if only one company could describe their
tickets as "cheap". In fact, all you have to do is look on Google to see that
Air Canada, Sears, and Expedia all offer "cheap tickets" in Internet
advertising, so there is no reason why just one company should have the
exclusive right to do so."
Internet lawyer, Zak Muscovitch, who successfully represented Emall.ca
Inc., said "This dispute started off with the travel agency claiming that they
had a right to my client's domain name, CheapTickets.ca, because they had
registered trademarks. The dispute has ended with my client rightfully keeping
its domain name, and the travel agency losing its registered trademarks. They
should never have been issued them in the first place. This is a lesson for
overreaching trademark owners. We are ecstatic about the decision. Justice was
definitely served."
Descriptive domain names have become extraordinarily valuable with the
explosive growth of the pay-per-click internet advertising revenue model.
Accordingly, registrants of good descriptive domain names tend to fiercely
resist challenges to their registration. Emall.ca Inc. is a pioneer in the
registration of .ca domain names, and recently sold nearly four hundred of its
generic .ca domain names to the Yellow Pages Group for 2.5 million dollars.
Said Mr. Maxymych, "We have collected the best .ca domain name portfolio in
the country and we see a very bright future for .ca domain names as Internet
advertising continues to grow so dramatically."



For further information: Peter Maxymych, President, Emall.ca Inc., (514)
844-3332, [email protected]; Harold Simpkins, Vice-President of Marketing,
Emall.ca Inc., (514) 844-3332, [email protected]; Zak Muscovitch, Barrister &
Solicitor, (416) 450-7656 (cell), [email protected] (for a copy of the
decision)
 
1
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
Congratulations on the successful case, Zak. That's an amazing victory for the domain holder. Welcome to NP!
 
0
•••
Thanks for the Welcome to NamePros

Thanks RJ! It's a real pleasure to participate in this community as domainers are the only ones who can truly appreciate the fights that I fight. Anyone who has ever gotten a cease and desist letter from a huge firm representing an ever huger company knows how tough it is to fight trademark owners. It has been really nice to see the kind words of appreciation from NamePros members.
Best Regards,

Zak
 
2
•••
Congratulations on your victory Zak!
And welcome to the forum :)
 
1
•••
Hello, welcome and congratulations :)
 
0
•••
About time you joined the party, Zak. I wonder why you used the current nick
instead of your real name at DNF. :D
 
0
•••
blueline7 said:
Further to Patrick's thread, for which I thank him, and Frank Schilling's Blog comments, for which I thank him too, I was the attorney who succesffuly represented the owner of cheaptickets.ca
Zak Muscovitch

blueline7 said:
Federal Court Rules For Descriptive Domains

:hi: MR.Zak Esq.

I like MY headline better:
"Generic Domain Name Holder Kicks Butt!". :hehe:

Great job!!!

Patrick
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Almost forgot to mention. Take note that this occurred in a Canadian Federal
Court for a .ca domain name, not US.

Even though this dispute was decided accordingly, there's no requirement for
other courts in other jurisdictions to see it that way as well, especially if one
or so facts were present or absent.
 
0
•••
tricolorro said:
:hi: MR.Zak Esq.

I like MY headline better:
"Generic Domain Name Holder Kicks Butt!". :hehe:

Great job!!!

Patrick

Hi,

I would just like to make it clear that I was thrilled that Zak made this thread which was an offshoot of my earlier thread:
"Generic Domain Name Holder Kicks Butt!".

I posted links to the relevant material in that thread as I didn't think it was appropriate for me to copy and paste the actual content from the articles .

Since Zak was a Principle in that legal matter he so graciously posted the content from one of my links.

My comment that I liked my headline better was meant to be humorous. I in no way felt Zak was "stepping" on my thread.

As far as I am concerned there was no etiquette faux pas.

I applaud Zak's contribution and hope it is just the first of much more to come.

Regards,
Patrick
 
0
•••
Dynadot โ€” .com TransferDynadot โ€” .com Transfer
Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
NameMaxi - Your Domain Has Buyers
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back