"This case illustrates several points parties to a UDRP should remember:
1. If a domain name consists of generic or potentially descriptive terms, some UDRP panelists want to see evidence that the domain registrant targeted the complainant's brand specifically when registering it.
2. Complainants must establish both bad-faith registration and use of a domain name. One without the other will not suffice.
3. Frivolous arguments carry consequences for respondents, as well as complainants."
https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates...main-name-hijacking-argument-goes-up-in-smoke
1. If a domain name consists of generic or potentially descriptive terms, some UDRP panelists want to see evidence that the domain registrant targeted the complainant's brand specifically when registering it.
2. Complainants must establish both bad-faith registration and use of a domain name. One without the other will not suffice.
3. Frivolous arguments carry consequences for respondents, as well as complainants."
https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates...main-name-hijacking-argument-goes-up-in-smoke