Domains @ NamesCon Auction?

[Internet.Domains]

NamesCon, which prides itself as being "the largest annual domain-industry conference" is auctioning DomainNames.com. The auction will be live in front of the the largest annual domain-industry conference.

This particular domain has an interesting past as it was originally sold to a reputable senior NamePros member and taken back by Network Solutions. The domain was sold BIN and the buyer paid $2577 via credit card. The domain was in possession of the buyer for an entire two days prior to being clawed back by Network Solutions. The buyer had full control of the domain and even changed the DNS settings. There was a passionate thread here on NamePros regarding. You can read the entire thread here:

https://www.namepros.com/threads/i-...tworksolutions-but-they-took-it-back.1065682/


Should NamesCon be auctioning a domain, with this type of history, in front of the largest domain-industry conference?

What does this say to the NamePros member who originally purchased the domain?
What does this say about the domain-industry as a whole?
Is the domain-industry content with this type of behavior?
As NamePros members, should we accept this type of behavior toward our fellow members?
Would this happen in other industries?

 

[Furquan]

NamesCon, which prides itself as being "the largest annual domain-industry conference" is auctioning DomainNames.com. The auction will be live in front of the the largest annual domain-industry conference.

This particular domain has an interesting past as it was originally sold to a reputable senior NamePros member and taken back by Network Solutions. The domain was sold BIN and the buyer paid $2577 via credit card. The domain was in possession of the buyer for an entire two days prior to being clawed back by Network Solutions. The buyer had full control of the domain and even changed the DNS settings. There was a passionate thread here on NamePros regarding. You can read the entire thread here:

https://www.namepros.com/threads/i-...tworksolutions-but-they-took-it-back.1065682/


Should NamesCon be auctioning a domain, with this type of history, in front of the largest domain-industry conference?

What does this say to the NamePros member who originally purchased the domain?
What does this say about the domain-industry as a whole?
Is the domain-industry content with this type of behavior?
As NamePros members, should we accept this type of behavior toward our fellow members?
Would this happen in other industries?

As far as shit commision involved I will even sell the shit emoji domain name. Why should they care about an individual person concern? they only concern on their commision.

 

[Internet.Domains]

Why should they care about an individual person concern?

That's a fair question that is discussed very heavily regarding ETHICS.

 

[Furquan]

That's a fair question that is discussed very heavily regarding ETHICS.

They do not care about the fairness as I said all they care is "commision". No one here thinks that they don't know about the history of this much-discussed name but yet they included this domain in the auction.