Understandable.I swear to god, I heard a gong go off when I finished reading your post.
Can't find that word in the English dictionary.Try to appreciate the precpets of creativity
So PizzaC isn't 'piz zac'?I don't know what the "suffix alphabet" is- I'm pretty sure it's the same thing as the good old fashioned English language alphabet, given that in the context of this discussion, any letter can be a relevant suffix so long as it doesn't interfere with the pronunciation of the word,
Well, let's see, it means Pizza CHEEZE? or Pizza CINCINNATTI? or Pizza CHEAP?, or again.. - Piz Zac?and the suffix in question can be branded with any word that happens to begin with that letter.
For example, if I live in the famous pizza town of Chicago and I own "PizzaC.com", do you really- SERIOUSLY- struggle to see the generic brandability value in that? Honestly?
I was discussing 'suffixs'. And what we did have in i-e's, are long gone now.Please inform of all premium keywords you have with e, V or I prefixes and let me know how "cheap" you're willing to sell them for.
??? I realize you may not be up on this yet, but 'm' is for mobile, and as some are real keyed up on 'm dots' for mobile sites, I, and others, can see not only 'm' coming into play, but because it could be a typo of an 'm dot' site, perhaps even desirable for those who have those names for 'brand protection'.I'm perfectly willing to put my money where my mouth is. As far as the "M" prefix, I really don't know of anything special with that, other than you seem to own a few of them and might not want to appear to be making an argument against something you yourself seem to be invested in.
Of course not. Yet look up any 'keywordSUFFIX' name, insuranceG., LoansQ. etc, and 95%, or more, of them are only parked pages, not 'developed' sites.It has absolutely nothing to do with "typos".
Understandable.
Can't find that word in the English dictionary.
So PizzaC isn't 'piz zac'?
Well, let's see, it means Pizza CHEEZE? or Pizza CINCINNATTI? or Pizza CHEAP?, or again.. - Piz Zac?
??? I realize you may not be up on this yet, but 'm' is for mobile, and as some are real keyed up on 'm dots' for mobile sites, I, and others, can see not only 'm' coming into play, but because it could be a typo of an 'm dot' site, perhaps even desirable for those who have those names for 'brand protection'.
Of course not. Yet look up any 'keywordSUFFIX' name, insuranceG., LoansQ. etc, and 95%, or more, of them are only parked pages, not 'developed' sites.
And I'll probably get more for my eAutoLoans.com than you would for your PizzaC or ChairsW. But... then, maybe not. ..maybe not!
Hello what do you guys think about domain name prefix e and i? Which one is better e or i?
I just bought iran(letter-suffix).com - something like IranW.com
IMO, these single letter variety prefixes (which I usually prefer, but in some cases I will take suffixes)) are just ridiculously good values in the year 2009. Obviously, there is only one keyword.com. There are only two "standard" prefixes- E and I, so ekeyword and ikeyword.com.
That leaves a remaining 24 letter prefixes in the whole wide world for any given pure keyword.
Some of them cause a disruption with the flow of pronunciation (for example, goranges.com or pireland.com) meaning that the remaining letter prefix/suffix domains that don't (OrangesB.com or xireland.com) leave a hugely open ended dev possibility for very cheap with a near bullseye keyword .com.
IMO, In 10 years, people will look back on the days when they could get single letter prefix/suffix domains like "chairsw.com" or "rtables.com" for closeout prices and kick themselves for not buying. Of course, not that I care if they do or not. More for me :D :D :D
I hold a few and I hope to set up a site for listing such names.
(hmm, more blanks filled in.)I think I like you Dongsman...
Now, now labrocca. According to some 'berating logic' slung here, "if you struggle to see the generic brandability value in that" - 'mPizzas' means MahattanPizzas, I mean MichiganPizzas, I mean Minneso..., well it's so easy to see..it's a brandable!!mPizzas.com
Would it make more sense as Mobile Pizzas or Miama Pizzas, Maine Pizzas, Michigan Pizzas, and such. Mobile Pizzas....hmm...can't seem to really believe as a prefix it works as mobile.
..
Please advise when you do. I would join in a second, mainly as a buyer.
I like these alot. Here are some of the domains (.com) I've registered over the past few years:
...
This is worse than the LLLL .com buyout.I just bought iran(letter-suffix).com - something like IranW.com
IMO, these single letter variety prefixes (which I usually prefer, but in some cases I will take suffixes)) are just ridiculously good values in the year 2009.
Having trouble following along?Fire sale time. You won't get reg fee for 90% of those.
This is worse than the LLLL .com buyout.
The only way bKeyword.com sees the value you say it will and gets developed along with cKeyword.com, pKeyword.com, yKeyword.com, etc... is if brand identity suddenly becomes meaningless.
Having trouble following along?
Most of these reg's are future value oriented. The beauty is, we both get to place our bets and eventually, find out who's right and who's wrong. And actually, I bet he beats reg on more than 10% of those right now.
So you are going to register a bunch of [keyword][random].com's hoping that one day a developer associated with the keyword will have a meaning for the random letter. That sounds like a very dangerous gamble.presuming the prefix/suffix letter in question is relevant to the brand or product. For example, FordB.com could very easily be Ford Blog.
I guess in 20 years chairsw pizzav and the like might go for the equivalent of 2X reg fee.
So you are going to register a bunch of [keyword][random].com's hoping that one day a developer associated with the keyword will have a meaning for the random letter. That sounds like a very dangerous gamble.
ok, so when do you propose that this "end" is where we can see who's bets are/were right? how many years from now should we wait until we refer back to this thread and see? :blink:

