Hi, all. 
Does it use more server CPU or RAM if your site images call for the full URL's (like http://www.yoursite.com/folder/another_folder/image.jpg), rather than just "../image.jpeg"?
My webhost (Lunarpages) is incessantly complaining that my images are using more than 2% server CPU/RAM, saying they think it's caused by "the normal http access to the images". They've also mentioned "too many PHP calls" (Wordpress blog), but I don't think that's an image thing.
Any ideas?
Does it use more server CPU or RAM if your site images call for the full URL's (like http://www.yoursite.com/folder/another_folder/image.jpg), rather than just "../image.jpeg"?
My webhost (Lunarpages) is incessantly complaining that my images are using more than 2% server CPU/RAM, saying they think it's caused by "the normal http access to the images". They've also mentioned "too many PHP calls" (Wordpress blog), but I don't think that's an image thing.
Any ideas?







