domain codecsdivx.com

[optimal]

Thanks for appraising my domain codecsdivx.com.Some stats
22K exact monthly searches in Google,and 132kresults in Google.The niche knows several domain sales in the near past.I appreciate your input.

 

[optimal]

Bump.Tell me something.Thanks

 

[optimal]

Bump.

 

[optimal]

Bump.I would thank very much for any comments.

 

[GiftedDomains]

this is regfee.

divxcodecs or divxcodec would be ok, but even these names are limited to one codec which everyone knows is free to download on divx.com website.

so what can you do to do with this name?
nothing. and no one will buy it.
delete it and save renewal fees in the future

 

[optimal]

Thanks for your view.I must tell you that god created you with a limited imagination.There are endless fixes and patches around this product that make 22000 people a month type EXACTLY my domain name.I could make very nice money with the most elementary Adsense for content if I where short of imagination.Your blaber is a desperate attemp to run away from the reality that this is a great domain to sell or to develop.I luck the understanding why you act in such a manner but hey,to be so "cruel" is the second best thing after finding a killer domain or after having decent sex.That may justify such a behaviour.Good luck.:lol:

 

[GiftedDomains]

well then all the best with your multi million dollar domain name.
oh and 22000 people search each month for [codecs divx] and not [divx codecs]?
i think i am gonne register EstateRealWebsite.com - great name!!
good luck with your adsense website )

 

[MasterOfMyDomains]

reg fee

I mean 0.001 canadian dollars

 

[optimal]

Yes master.By the way,I dont know if those canadian domains of yours are for appraisal,but they are really Reg fees.To follow your comment HQ The fact is that the strong keyword in the niche according to the Google exact searches is CODECSDIVX.(as said 22k)That means that you may be looking at the world upside down.(or everybody else is wrong).
Anyway we learn from everyone.Thanks

 

[exsedo]

Hi,
Dont get too upset about peoples appraisals. I am sure there is no other motive than to help you.
Search terms are often mis-interperated and I have to agree with HQDomains here. The term is the wrong way round, but of course you may be able to sell it or make an MFA site to get your reg fee back. Good Luck in your future registrations.

 

[optimal]

Thanks to all.I think I found the reason of our different views:In the DIVX niche there are 2 main keywords.The first in importance as said by HQ and substained by EXSEDO is"divx codec" with 100K searches and the seccond is "CODEC'S "DIVX" with 22K as claimed by myself.Pay attention to the ' between the codec and the s.Both are strong keywords and both are gramatically correct.
In other words the lack of the sign" ' " which cannot be included in a domain name is the reason of the confusion,so both keywords are correct and valid,and even if divx codec is better still my domain
codec's divx is an excelet domain,correct gramatically and with a big bunch of exact searches.
We were all confused.Best regards.
Optimal

 

[Smartphone]

$0 to reg fee for this name.

 

[cwinhall]

I think the appraisals forum should have a mandatory IQ test to be passed before someone can start a topic.

 

[optimal]

I tell you man,idiots come in all sizes.

 

[MicroGuy]

If the words were reversed if might have some minimal value. I would grace delete if possible. The domain is worthless in my view.

Zero $0.00. IMO.

Best of luck with your future domaining adventures.

 

[optimal]

No dear.The words can be expressed correctly both ways.(I explained that above)My domain is woth to an end user low $.$$$.It has lots of natural good quality trafic ON URL even.The niche is hot.
You can say that your grandchild is the sun of your daughter,or your dughter's sun.Similarly you can say the same thing saying divx (by) codec or codec's divx.Both are correct and the proof is that both have over 20K of exact monthly searches in GooGle.

 

[shig]

Develop it and try to sell for traffic. Sorry, you will never sell it for x,xxx dollars though. The only people that would be interested in buying the domain would be people who make money off adsense and the max ppc bid is only 10 cents. To really get value out of a domain name you need to be able to sell it to a company/corp. You could try getting rid of it for xx but I still think you may have issues getting rid of it. Good Luck!

 

[cwinhall]

No dear.The words can be expressed correctly both ways.(I explained that above)My domain is woth to an end user low $.$$$.It has lots of natural good quality trafic ON URL even.The niche is hot.
You can say that your grandchild is the sun of your daughter,or your dughter's sun.Similarly you can say the same thing saying divx (by) codec or codec's divx.Both are correct and the proof is that both have over 20K of exact monthly searches in GooGle.

did u just appraise your own domain after posting a topic to appraise it? Why do you even post on these forums?

divx codecs are FREE, completely, utterly, FREE. What possible incentive is there to go to your domain name to get the FREE codecs instead of the real divx website? What ads can you run on your website that will intice your make believe visitors to click on your ads?

You live in a dreamworld "dear".

 

[optimal]

Thanks shig for your input.

 

[GiftedDomains]

Thanks to all.I think I found the reason of our different views:In the DIVX niche there are 2 main keywords.The first in importance as said by HQ and substained by EXSEDO is"divx codec" with 100K searches and the seccond is "CODEC'S "DIVX" with 22K as claimed by myself.Pay attention to the ' between the codec and the s.Both are strong keywords and both are gramatically correct.
In other words the lack of the sign" ' " which cannot be included in a domain name is the reason of the confusion,so both keywords are correct and valid,and even if divx codec is better still my domain
codec's divx is an excelet domain,correct gramatically and with a big bunch of exact searches.
We were all confused.Best regards.
Optimal

this is my last attempt:

these are the results of your "codec's divx" theory:

Google

i think i don't have to add anything to this!

btw, congratulations, your are on first page of google with this thread with the super keyword Combi "codec's divx"

:bingo: