Anees Ahmad
Established Member
- Impact
- 124
closed
Last edited:
$1 all
$2 all
3 all
$6.66 ALL
$8 all.
$10 all
$11 all
$12 all
13 all
$14 all
15all
16all
20 all
25all
30 all
35 all
40 all
I was saying 40 for all the domains together not separately.Last bid: $40 per name
Total: $40 x 6 = $240
Next bid: (You can bid $41 or more for individual names or $41 or more per name for all names together as last bid)
Same; I believe everyone else was as well .I was saying 40 for all the domains together not separately.
I was saying 40 for all the domains together not separately.
Same; I believe everyone else was as well .
We can see where the seller tried to change the bids for "All" domains to "Each" after a binding bid was placed, which is not allowed.6.2.3. An auction cannot be modified once a bid is placed with the exceptions of its Buy-It-Now ("BIN") price (e.g., a BIN price may be added), its bid increments, approving additional bidders, adding payment methods, and/or adding additional domains at no extra cost. Once a bid is placed, every allowable change (the exceptions just mentioned) must be posted to the thread as a new reply as well as updated in the original post before it becomes effective and valid (e.g., a BIN price cannot be accepted until that is done, but rule 6.2.10 applies). BIN prices are not reserve prices and therefore do not affect rule 6.2.10.
Could you please mention the area where you think this is happened?We can see where the seller tried to change the bids for "All" domains to "Each" after a binding bid was placed, which is not allowed.
Hello,Dear @Echo Mod Team
Could you please mention the area where you think this is happened?
This is from what you have quoted from the original post.
As you can see the there was no "bid all" option ever.
Still the first bid was "$1 all". I thought (and still thinks) he was bidding $1 for each names.
But for the new bidders to understand I mentioned in the description to specify the domain names with the bids. Unfortunately all new bids were of the same kind.
This was confusing indeed. When I found this out, I had already closed the thread and contacted the highest bidder via DM and explained this.