Dynadot โ€” .com Transfer

Can .ws domain replace .com popularity?

Spacemail by SpaceshipSpacemail by Spaceship
Watch
Impact
0
Hello all.
I'm new in this. Just registered a .ws domain . I registered under the free trial. Can anyone experienced in this please have a look at their website and let me know what you think? The website is website dot ws.

Thanks in advance!
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
Nope, never.
 
0
•••
Very unlikely.

Welcome to NP. :tu:
 
0
•••
Get your money back.
 
0
•••
Simply no.
 
0
•••
wot said:
Get your money back.

Though .com is by far a better choice .ws isn't bad if you plan on developing it.
 
0
•••
bd77 said:
Though .com is by far a better choice .ws isn't bad if you plan on developing it.
I disagree about developing it, unless your are using it as a direct marketing site.

Putting in long hours to develop a .ws to get back what a .com could do is insane. It's like intentionally buying a crappy Le Car from 1985 when you could have just as easily bought a Cadillac Escalade .

It's best days are already over......it should be called .was .

Does anyone remember the Le Car ? D-:
 
0
•••
I remember "Le car", I have to admit I actually had one back in those days when I lived in the UK. It was known as a Renault 5 and good fun to drive, especially the turbo version.
Many Europeans had to use smaller cars as gas prices have always been comparitively higher.

As far as .ws.......Not a chance of ever being in the same ballpark as .com.
 
0
•••
The reason why I am all over 3 and 4 letter .coms is that a .com is so so much more valuable and will continue to gain value as compared to other tld's. If you own a .info, .ws, .net, .org, .us, .CC, .whatever other extentions they will soon come out with, you will consistantly lose traffic to people going to the .com version of that domain. Making the owner of that domain lots of cash.
 
0
•••
I don't think any other extension could beat .com
 
0
•••
"Does anyone remember the Le Car ?"

lol...I do
 
0
•••
.ws will never even over take .info .org or .us
 
0
•••
.ws is dead (if it has ever been alive to begin with)
 
0
•••
EKG is showing a "flatline" for that extension. If you are satisfied with your name then great but as for extension value compared to .com well "Not a snowballs chance in hell" may sum it up.
 
0
•••
The question shouldn't be whether .ws can replace .com --- it clearly can't given the awareness and brandability of the .com extension. Rather, what value does .ws have, if at all?

I guess it is somewhat helpful for seo purposes to have a keyword rich domain name in a relatively unknown extension if you can't afford to get it in a prime extension, but that is all that comes to mind.
 
0
•••
I remember one day I was telling my friend who is an amateur blogger about different extensions and I brought up .ws cause there was his favorite [keyword].ws available and he was like "WS??? WHAT THE HELL IS THAT?!" and said "no" to owning it for $8.

That pretty much sums up my answer to the title! :)


I do have fun trying to build BS websites and testing them out with .ws.
 
0
•••
WS will never beat COM.

WS will never take COM. Nothing will unless COM prices skyrocket to a million a year. Then, dotOrg is going to be hot, hot, hot.

However, I disagree with everyone else that other lower class TLDs like WS are totally useless. If you have a main website that's a COM, you can use any TLD to direct traffic to it. The reason is because Google doesn't care about the TLD. So you can get a premium WS for RegFee, then redirect all the links on it to your main COM that probably doesn't have premium keywords.

For example, domainnames,ws could easily redirect users to veryaffordablebutdifficulttotypedomainnames,com. Since most of us can't afford domainnames,com, it is useless to talk about how much better and wonderful it is.

I register lower TLDs as a marketing strategy. I have a bunch of lower class TLDs redirecting a few 50-100 users each month to my main page. I put mini-sites on them and invest very little time into them after they go online. Time being money. I only work on my COMs. I put it online and let it go. A good example is C---------s dot CC (name unimportant). I couldn't afford the COM, but could afford the $18 CC. So that $18 is getting me about 450-500 visitors each month. Since a paid visitor costs about a quarter (in my field), the lower grade domain extension has long since paid for itself.

Please keep in mind that I am not suggesting to use WS as your main website. I am also not suggesting massive time invested. That's pure folly. I am merely suggesting that good keywords can produce traffic and that traffic can be redirected to your COM. Using lower extensions as traffic boosters in this way is well worth the yearly RegFees.

Domainers buying these type of domain names to park them at SEDO and to resell them at COM prices are suckers. Buying to park is a sure way to go broke.
 
0
•••
ooh no, it'll never happen with .ws




.
 
0
•••
Dynadot โ€” .com TransferDynadot โ€” .com Transfer
Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
NameMaxi - Your Domain Has Buyers
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back