domain Are Babies Even Allowed to Blog?

[andriegel]

Hey-

Just hand reg'd these:
babynamesblog.com
babynameblog.com

check the stats:
for "baby names":
Wordtracker 54K/day
Overture 40K/day
Google w/ quotes: 1.4 million
Google No quotes 9.2 million
babynames.com is 9686'th on Alexa

Please comment on value and usage.
Thanks!

Andrew
.
.
.

 

[Zeeble]

hmm well, I think low $xx as is.

 

[Petter]

low xx$ IMO

Good luck :wave:

Petter

 

[Greg Hal]

Low $xx undeveloped, worth much more if developed properly (i.e. a blog with baby names meanings and suggestions). Moms-to-be are fond of such sites.

 

[omnia]

Low - mid $xx, needs developing

 

[alegend]

low $xx without development IMO!

 

[nomis135]

low xx on both. IMO

 

[sufi]

Have to agree with others.. Low $xx for either

 

[kaliboy2g]

Wordtracker 54K/day
Overture 40K/day
Google w/ quotes: 1.4 million
Google No quotes 9.2 million
babynames.com is 9686'th on Alexa


This means absolutley nothing

 

[webgear]

mid $xx both IMHO

 

[seank1]

reg fee, nothing really to blog about in the "baby name" domain.

 

[calian]

The only way I can see turning the topic into a legitimate blog is to focus on trends in baby names. Sometimes you will see articles that have statistics like: Madison has replaced Stephanie at #3 on the most popular girls name chart or something. Basically have commentary on why some of these things might be taking place.

In other news, many parents have begun naming their sons LeBron but there is no reason we can find...

 

[Psycho]

Low $xx