NameSilo

About namebio.com

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

tom365

Established Member
Impact
152
I discovered that Namebio has set up the strictest access restrictions, solely to encourage people to purchase their website subscriptions. For instance, Cloudflare verification is difficult to pass, and VPN access is not allowed. I hope they can unblock my VPN IP visit, but they refuse to do so. They insist that I must purchase a membership. Isn't that the case?

I paid for two years fees to namebio.com, but the reason I'm not paying now is because I feel like I'm paying to remove VPN restrictions. I have submitted a fixed IP, but there is no restriction lifted; it only requires purchasing a membership. Without this access restriction, I would actually be more willing to pay.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
@Vertibox You're mistaken and uninformed, but what I'm really wondering is where all this negativity is coming from.
 
7
•••
@Vertibox You're mistaken and uninformed, but what I'm really wondering is where all this negativity is coming from.
It's not negative. Its observation and deduction.
The namebio dude should be the target of your assertion, but perhaps you are bum chums with them, so that isn't going to happen, if that is the case.

And if its is, perhaps this bum-chummery is making you blind to their amateur, juvenile and unnecessary behaviour and revealing petty attitudes.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
That is not realistic option.
Many people have multiple tabs or windows open at the same time, for many sites. So turning off their VPN leaves them vulnerable to those sites, even if those sites are not risky.

And so it is highly unlikely that someone who wants to use your site is just doing nothing and not looking or using any other sites when they think of visiting your site.

Plus, your abrasive manner shown in this thread is so amateur and also, unnecessary and it tells me you are not a professional or serious person. This will likely lead to your demise.

The amount of time the namebio person is spending typing out their replies on this thread is mostly unnecessary as is the lengthy content of them. It tells everyone what he is about.

But if he really doesn't care about the OP and their complaint, why engage like this?

I am not getting involved in the validity or otherwise of the OP's complaint, nor the issues namebio has to deal with/fight in its operations and integrity. I just know, from long life experience, that someone who engages in multiple back and forths with users/customers and in the manner that this Michael has, is likely headed for the dumpster of failed companies.

Ultimately, if enough people don't like the offering of namebio, they won't use it/pay for it. Plus, competitors will also emerge if they detect this.

Tell me you didn't actually read the whole thread without telling me...

OP made some harsh and unfair accusations, said some false statements, and I stuck with it and eventually was able to identify and resolve his issue. It would have been much easier to just ignore it.

Could I have handled it better? Sure, I have a pesky habit of getting defensive when attacked. I'm always learning though. And the language barrier made it more difficult at times.

He has since acknowledged that his opinion has changed and apologized for the accusations:

Just now Michael helped solve the issue of access restrictions. The root cause of the problem is that many users in our area have their computers controlled by viruses and access websites everywhere, resulting in a huge amount of abnormal access to many websites. Therefore, some IP segments have been banned, making it impossible for normal users to access namebio.com. Therefore, I misunderstood the purpose of namebio's judgment that my IP is a VPN. At present, it seems that namebio does need to do something to prevent these days of garbage access.

Here, I retract my previous negative opinion about Namebio. I'm sorry, I hope Michael can understand.

But sure... you, who have nothing to do with any of this and having not even read the whole thread, definitely has more of a right to be salty with me than the OP himself. That tracks.

I've been in this industry for 19 years, 11 of them with NameBio. I guess my trip to the dumpster you predicted is an extremely long and circuitous one. You've been around a whole year though, so you probably know best.

You don't seem to understand how VPNs work. If you visit a website that is HTTPS, which is nearly every site on the planet for quite a while now, it is end-to-end encrypted and you are not "vulnerable" without a VPN.

You could literally go to the airport, connect to their WiFi, log into your bank account with no VPN, with a hacker convention in town, and be totally fine. And any risks you might face in that hypothetical could also be said about using a third-party VPN. You're sure as heck fine on your home or work network without one.

If you're dead set on using one while visiting the site, you can pay for a membership. If you don't want to pay, you can either turn it off, find one that isn't blocked by virtue of us blocking major hosting companies, or not visit the site. That is the decision tree, like it or not.

Your desire to use a VPN unnecessarily doesn't supersede my responsibility to protect our site and our data, especially when you're getting everything for free. It might sound callous, but that's life.

I would much prefer that nobody abuse the site, to have no restrictions whatsoever, and to have not wasted years of my life battling attacks instead of adding new features... but that's also life.
 
8
•••
It's not negative. Its observation and deduction.
The namebio dude should be the target of your assertion, but perhaps you are bum chums with them, so that isn't going to happen, if that is the case.

And if its is, perhaps this bum-chummery is making you blind to their amateur, juvenile and unnecessary behaviour and revealing petty attitudes.
(just preserving this)
 
4
•••
@Michael

I forgot to add that there is a clear lack of intelligence about you and your ways of conducting yourself.
You also make assumptions without knowing anything at all about what you assume. How limited you have shown yourself to be.

As I already said, I am not involving myself as to the merits or otherwise of the OP's complaint/position, or why you demand what you demand. It's your business, and it's your right to make the choices you want.
I am just observing your conduct.

There are sites that do not use HTTPS, so your claim that it is used by "nearly every site on the planet" is both wrong and also, with zero basis for asserting it, as you have not visited and examined every website that exists and no-one ever will be able to do that.

I have seen your site mentioned many times on this forum but I have only visited it once or twice and not for long as I don't find it of any use for my involvement with domains. I was just curious about it.

But as I said, I think you/your company are heading for the failed company/executive dumpster.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
I am just observing your conduct.
Cat Ok GIF by sillynub
 
6
•••
likely headed for the dumpster of failed companies.

Yeah, it's only been in business eleven years so far, so we don't know how it will work out long term. Lol.
 
5
•••
5
•••
Yeah, it's only been in business eleven years so far, so we don't know how it will work out long term. Lol.
Much larger companies were in existence for much longer and still went bust.

Bear Sterns was in business for 85 years and then went bust.
Lehman Brothers were in business for considerably longer, before going bust in 2008.
Barings Bank was even older still and went bust from a single rogue trader.
These are just a few that I can name of the tip of my head.

Longevity alone is no protection on viability.

Silly comment, really.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Much larger companies were in existence for much longer and still went bust.

Bear Sterns was in business for 85 years and then went bust.
Lehman Brothers were in business for considerably longer, before going bust in 2008.
Barings Bank was even older still and went bust from a single rogue trader.
These are just a few that I can name of the tip of my head.

Longevity alone is no protection on viability.

Silly comment, really.

You know, there's all kinds of reasons companies implode. Packaging up toxic subprime mortgages and selling them like hotcakes. Betting the farm on unauthorized futures trades in Singapore. Being terse on internet forums.

:xf.rolleyes:
 
4
•••
No, he's right, Michael. Your company is doomed to make billions of dollars for generations, and then go bust. You should move into a cardboard box now.
 
1
•••
1
•••
No, he's right, Michael. Your company is doomed to make billions of dollars for generations, and then go bust. You should move into a cardboard box now.

On my knees praying for a bailout as we speak. Something something too big to fail.
 
2
•••
No, he's right, Michael. Your company is doomed to make billions of dollars for generations, and then go bust. You should move into a cardboard box now.
When someone can't put forth valid points, despite them not being asked to do so, they tend to reach for irrelevant things, silly things and juvenile things.

Sad way to behave John.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Emotions in .motion
👀
 
2
•••
0
•••
Gif-leaving-laughing.gif
 
1
•••
When someone can't put forth valid points, despite them not being asked to do so, they tend to reach for irrelevant things, silly things and juvenile things.

Sad way to behave John.

You mean like critiquing someone's demeanor in a thread you didn't read about a website you don't use?

🤔
 
5
•••
Why is this guys account disallowed @Bravo Mod Team ?
Do they have second account?
I see their bum cherry post is still up.
It was editted from bum cherry to bum-chummery
Real intelligent conversation, right from post one. jk haha


It's not negative. Its observation and deduction.
The namebio dude should be the target of your assertion, but perhaps you are bum chums with them, so that isn't going to happen, if that is the case.

And if its is, perhaps this bum-chummery is making you blind to their amateur, juvenile and unnecessary behaviour and revealing petty attitudes.

And thank you Namebio, wealth of information.
 
1
•••
Accusing people without any proof is illegal.
That's why his account is closed. Also new member does not allow talk too much.
 
0
•••

We're social

Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Live Options
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back