TOXX Ti.coVIP Member VIP ★ 20 ★ Impact 194 Nov 16, 2006 344 views 7 replies #1 :hi: Please appraise these 3 NNN .NET's: ... 488.NET 336.NET ... Thanks!
rrsae Established Member ★ 15 ★ Impact 7 Nov 16, 2006 #2 drpm said: :hi: Please appraise these 3 NNN .NET's: ... 488.NET 336.NET ... Thanks! Click to expand... hmm...i would pay for each ~600-700 $
drpm said: :hi: Please appraise these 3 NNN .NET's: ... 488.NET 336.NET ... Thanks! Click to expand... hmm...i would pay for each ~600-700 $
TOXX Ti.coVIP Member VIP ★ 20 ★ Impact 194 Nov 16, 2006 #3 Thanks Thanks! We've already received offers in the x,xxx range.
Bravo Established Member ★ 20 ★ Impact 37 Nov 16, 2006 #4 Hi, Just nothing to say more...Perfect names, with perfect numbers, plus combo numbers! 386.net went on SnapNames for $1,311.00. So my opinion, min. $2000 - $XXXX! Regards, Bravo
Hi, Just nothing to say more...Perfect names, with perfect numbers, plus combo numbers! 386.net went on SnapNames for $1,311.00. So my opinion, min. $2000 - $XXXX! Regards, Bravo
VirtualT Still AliveVIP Member VIP ★ 20 ★ Impact 54 Nov 16, 2006 #5 IMO 386.net is a better name than 336.net. 386 was like the first mass produced intel processor or something wasn't it? or was that the 286 :/
IMO 386.net is a better name than 336.net. 386 was like the first mass produced intel processor or something wasn't it? or was that the 286 :/
rrsae Established Member ★ 15 ★ Impact 7 Nov 16, 2006 #6 RoT said: IMO 386.net is a better name than 336.net. 386 was like the first mass produced intel processor or something wasn't it? or was that the 286 :/ Click to expand... both, and 486 also
RoT said: IMO 386.net is a better name than 336.net. 386 was like the first mass produced intel processor or something wasn't it? or was that the 286 :/ Click to expand... both, and 486 also
TOXX Ti.coVIP Member VIP ★ 20 ★ Impact 194 Nov 16, 2006 #7 Cool Thanks Bravo! I would also say repeat numbers "33" and "88" would be worth more than random ones.
Cool Thanks Bravo! I would also say repeat numbers "33" and "88" would be worth more than random ones.
VirtualT Still AliveVIP Member VIP ★ 20 ★ Impact 54 Nov 16, 2006 #8 drpm said: Thanks Bravo! I would also say repeat numbers "33" and "88" would be worth more than random ones. Click to expand... yeah, 336 is nice, the 4 devalues 488.net substantially though
drpm said: Thanks Bravo! I would also say repeat numbers "33" and "88" would be worth more than random ones. Click to expand... yeah, 336 is nice, the 4 devalues 488.net substantially though