The new Panelist disagreed, throwing out these claims, as the new UDRP presented no fresh data on the case.
Not only was the case denied on behalf of the Respondent, the Panelist found the Complainant guilty of engaging in Reverse Domain Name Hijacking: Read More.
The new Panelist disagreed, throwing out these claims, as the new UDRP presented no fresh data on the case.
Not only was the case denied on behalf of the Respondent, the Panelist found the Complainant guilty of engaging in Reverse Domain Name Hijacking: Read More.