Dynadot โ€” .com Transfer

security Does NamePros allow bots to make posts?

Namecheap AuctionsNamecheap Auctions
Namecheap AuctionsNamecheap Auctions
SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Compassion

Celebrate LifeTop Member
Impact
3,991
Hello members.....


With the onslaught of bot accounts on venues such as Youtube, Reddit and major news outlet sites, the question in regards to if Namepros allows bots to make posts is reasonable. as bots proliferate around the world.

Is there currently a policy allowing/now allowing bots on NP?
 
3
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
You might be right as far as the fact that we might have to wait a while longer to be able to benefit from the full potentials of AI, but we are in transformational and transitional times and things can develop much faster than we can anticipate and for that reason sometimes the lines between hype and reality might get blurred as something that sounds like hype this year might become reality in just a few years later.

There are plenty of ways we can benefit, but don't expect a fully-interactive bot just yet.

If you have proposals for ways in which NamePros could benefit from AI, we're all ears, but the best proposals probably won't involve bots that act like humans. We already have humans for that.

Nevertheless you are sitting on a wealth of Big Data that is contained in this forum which represents the collective knowledge of the domaining community and which might come in handy if and when you decide to use it to train the NamePros AI.

I have been trying to be helpful by introducing certain new ideas to the community here, but I do respect the fact that at end NamePros is a business and as such the responsibility ultimately falls on your shoulders to decide what is in yours and NamePros' interest,

While I'm a programmer and security professional, not a sociologist or psychologist, I do worry about the current state of the relationship between our society and technology. As technology improves, some of the biggest hurdles we will encounter won't be with the technology itself, but in how we develop and codify ethics and policy surrounding it. These are tough problems to solve, and we've only seen the tip of the iceberg.

While I'm personally not opposed to using AI in a way that benefits the community, it has to be done in a responsible manner, and that's not easy to achieve if the AI is interacting directly with users. I don't have a good solution for that, but we're certainly open to suggestions.

Going forward I try not to be too disruptive with this or any other subject. :xf.smile:

Disruptive ideas are great! Since this particular topic happens to overlap with my area of expertise, I'm attempting to ensure the discussion moves forward in a manner that facilitates debate over features an policies that are likely to be relevant in the near-term while simultaneously dispelling fear that might exist surrounding the topic.

NamePros hasn't seen truly intelligent AI yet. Even if it exists somewhere out there, most of the automated posting we see doesn't even make an attempt to be particularly deceptive. As it stands, we don't expect it to be a near-term concern, although that could always change.

This is certainly a topic you're free to discuss here, but I do have a few requests:
  1. Please don't turn this into a witch hunt. If you suspect that another member is a bot, and you'd like to discuss the matter with me personally, DM me. The thread needs to remain constructive, not accusatory. (I'm not saying this has been an issue in the thread yet, but I suspect it will become an issue.)
  2. We already have humans who act like humans. The best uses of AI will probably be to handle tasks that humans can't, not to impersonate humans. Please try to find uses for AI that fill gaps that can't better be filled by humans.
  3. Please do your best not to promote fear. This can be a scary topic for a lot of people, especially those who aren't dealing with the limitations of computers on a daily basis as part of their job. By extension, this means the following types of statements aren't constructive:
    1. "Bots are running rampant and spreading misinformation on platform X, therefore they must be doing the same thing on NamePros."
    2. "I, for one, welcome our new robot overloards."
  4. Avoid logical fallacies in your arguments.
 
3
•••
You mean the artificial intelligence "software" that enables f.e. namestudio.com to analyze effect of word to word frequency, infer the meaning of each word in a sentence and all the surrounding words as well? That's not AI.

In order to build something like domain name appraisal / naming software, I will need a trillions of data ... + patterns in registrants activity [f.e. search query - typing input, hot jar, etc] provided by registrars and registries > not gonna happen) and on-the-fly structured transformer-model machine learning + cover-base capable of delivering - dialogue.

Only if a whole Domain name / naming industry come together and collect f.e. (start) $200m. We can talk about it.

Today, "AI based" brand name idea generator, naming engine is just a bunch of data stuffed into whatever database and upon request delivered to the front via IF this-than-that-otherwise = this-that *priorities .ext etc etc. Any valuator / appraisal engine company using sort of machine learning ... they'll need more info than "sold for", "keyword used", "reg. in number of ext" etc.

No data, No AI.

Regards

Aren't you repeating back to me what I just said myself.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
0
•••
  1. Please don't turn this into a witch hunt. If you suspect that another member is a bot, and you'd like to discuss the matter with me personally, DM me. The thread needs to remain constructive, not accusatory. (I'm not saying this has been an issue in the thread yet, but I suspect it will become an issue.)

All good points,

but

I am not sure if you are addressing the above request to me or is this for the members in the forum in general,

For the record I have never accused any other member here of being a Bot and I am sure that I am not going to start doing so now.

IMO
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Would you consider my wife is bot if she posts on my behalf?
 
Last edited:
1
•••
I am not sure if you are addressing the above request to me or is this for the members in the forum in general,

Just in general. :)


Would you consider my wife is bot if she posts ion my behalf?

Iโ€™m sorry @johnn, but we donโ€™t allow shared accounts. Iโ€™m going to have you ban you.
 
1
•••
You supply the bot, I'll supply the willing victim (myself).
Would you consider my wife is bot if she posts on my behalf?

Curious minds wonder if one of the $1 million Japanese do-everything-a-wife-can robots can operate a computer and post on NP? :glasses:
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Just clarifying :) so it can help other users/readers think about.

I meant as far as the Big Data that can be used to train AI

non of the examples that you have mentioned are true AI

But that doesn't mean that someday soon the domain Industry can't have its own AI that has the collective knowledge and expertise of the domaining community as a base to use for reaching a higher level of knowledge and expertise of its own.

IMO
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Ok Paul. I will tell her that you will ban me. Expect to receive a phone call from her.
 
0
•••
Please keep your wives and companion robots out of these discussions,

We are trying to build the ultimate AI domainer here. :xf.wink:
 
1
•••
Oldtimers are always oldtimers. Always being serious and can't take a joke.
Come on man - Laugh.
 
0
•••
Oldtimers are always oldtimers. Always being serious and can't take a joke.
Come on man - Laugh.

I did laugh when I read your first post, but if the joke is going to dominate the discussion and take it off topic I guess there comes a point that it won't be a joke anymore.

So give us a serious opinion about what role you think AI is going to play in the domain Industry in the near future.

IMO
 
0
•••

A ten year old clip...




I like this comment:
America makes AI: "Okay, I will destroy humans."
Japan makes AI: "Would you like to take a photograph?"


Referring to:





What could a domaining robot be programmed to do? O_o
 
0
•••
In the interest of transparency, I deleted the most recent post in this thread because it clearly violated the the basic requirements I laid out for this discussion to be constructive.

This discussion can only take place if people aren't spreading fear and outright misinformation in the form of sensationalized YouTube videos. The post in question included a video titled "Hot Robot At SXSW Says She Wants To Destroy Humans" front and center. I will happily go on a rant about how someone is just trying to harness sex and fear for that sweet ad revenue, but that should be blatantly obvious given the title and platform on which it was posted.

Look, you can daydream all you want about sadistic sex bots--that's none of my business--but keep it out of NamePros suggestion threads, please.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
If a bot is useful and can accomplish some automation on a basic level, I'm all for that. Depends entirely on what the bot is for

The problem arises when a bot is following strict commands. This can be problematic in technical situations ...they don't have "human level" reasoning, yet (that will change)

If any bot can limit the accounts of spammers, "s*** posting" and swiftly move wrongly sectioned posts to the appropriate places of the forum ...for a start, I'd like that
 
Last edited:
0
•••
In the interest of transparency, I deleted the most recent post in this thread because it clearly violated the the basic requirements I laid out for this discussion to be constructive.

That's great, It's about time that you all started cleaning up the forum,

but in the interest of transparency I believe you should also indicate who makes the inappropriate posts as to not to implicate other members here who want to engage in a professional, constructive, and respectful discussion.

IMO
 
0
•••
In the interest of transparency, I deleted the most recent post in this thread because it clearly violated the the basic requirements I laid out for this discussion to be constructive.

This discussion can only take place if people aren't spreading fear and outright misinformation in the form of sensationalized YouTube videos. The post in question included a video titled "Hot Robot At SXSW Says She Wants To Destroy Humans" front and center. I will happily go on a rant about how someone is just trying to harness sex and fear for that sweet ad revenue, but that should be blatantly obvious given the title and platform on which it was posted.

Look, you can daydream all you want about sadistic sex bots--that's none of my business--but keep it out of NamePros suggestion threads, please.

There was no violation.
There was no sensationalism.
The videos show that the AI technology at a consumer level has been very advanced for quite some time, particularly so in Japan.

The point is : AI Technology is already VERY advanced. Significantly more advanced than what the basic premise of this thread asks...

If a robot can already replace every element of a human wife in Japan, most certainly a robot can make posts on a forum. This is the foundation of the topic and proposes a legitimate question for those who are here.








So you are saying CNBC made a sensational video to attract revenue and viewers?
 
Last edited:
0
•••
If a robot can already replace every element of a human wife in Japan, most certainly a robot can make posts on a forum. This is the foundation of the topic and proposes a legitimate question for those who are here.

Please state whether you're worried about this on namePros, or that you would welcome it on namePros.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
So you are saying CNBC made a sensational video to attract revenue and viewers?

Yes. It's a clickbait title that doesn't even have much relevance to the actual video. Now stop posting irrelevant nonsense in a suggestion thread.

If a robot can already replace every element of a human wife in Japan

This is becoming the new Godwin's Law. Your personal preference for attractive visuals over coherent linguistic skills does not constitute a pertinent line of reasoning.

If you encounter a sex bot on NamePros, I can assure you with a high degree of confidence that it's a scam. Do not give the sex bot your credit card. Report the sex bot.
 
2
•••
Yes. It's a clickbait title that doesn't even have much relevance to the actual video. Now stop posting irrelevant nonsense in a suggestion thread.



This is becoming the new Godwin's Law. Your personal preference for attractive visuals over coherent linguistic skills does not constitute a pertinent line of reasoning.

If you encounter a sex bot on NamePros, I can assure you with a high degree of confidence that it's a scam. Do not give the sex bot your credit card. Report the sex bot.



My central point is this: If a human being can buy a robot that does EVERYTHING a wife can do for a $1 million price tag... What guarantees do we have that a robot is not posting on Namepros already?

The ten year old clip from Japan showed robots designed to interact with people in a clinical setting.

The CNBC clip showed "Sophia" which is also already very old outdated tech.



The AI already being utilized worldwide is extremely advanced.

I appreciate your intellectually anchored response to the dialogue that seeks resolution.




707px-Graham%27s_Hierarchy_of_Disagreement.svg.png
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Dynadot โ€” .com TransferDynadot โ€” .com Transfer
CatchedCatched
Escrow.com
Spaceship
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
DomDB
NameFit
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back