information UDRP Filed Against Premium Domain iBuy.com

Skyvisum · Jul 22, 2015

I hope they get into the hall of shame

Chetan · Jul 22, 2015

We will soon see ibuy stores inc gaing Fame in Hall of Shame

Nazz · Jul 22, 2015

This should be interesting.

xull · Jul 22, 2015

I hope Albert will win.

*prepare popcorn*

GravityEleven · Jul 22, 2015

not interesting at all because the only possible result is clear as daylight -> RDNH

more interesting are those shaky cases where the outcome is not that easy to guess..

NPer · Jul 22, 2015

GravityEleven said:
not interesting at all because the only possible result is clear as daylight -> RDNH

more interesting are those shaky cases where the outcome is not that easy to guess..

GravityEleven said:
not interesting at all because the only possible result is clear as daylight -> RDNH

You may not find it interesting, however, it points to how flawed the UDRP process is. There should be guidelines used by ICANN in which filings like these should be dismissed, and the registrant should not have to stress, and spend his money to protect his domain. No ads on the site at all, and a bunch of other reasons why the registrant should not need to defend his registration.

When the company/individual filing for UDRP pays the fee, and it is quite clear that the registrant is not in the wrong, the complainant should receive a message from ICANN saying the reasons given is not adequate enough, and that filing is dismissed. The complainant should also lose the UDRP fee paid to ICANN. This would seem more fair to me, and prevent RDNH from happening. Currently the registrant needs to stress, perhaps pay for the services of someone like John Berryhill to defend himself.

pchip · Jul 22, 2015

Along with the complainant losing any UDRP fees paid, I think there should be monies paid to the defendant for damages in the event the complainant looses the case. At the very least, they should have to pay all legal fees accrued by the defendant.

This probably isn't going to deter companies from doing this but it would allow people who that don't have thousands to defend themselves an opportunity to rightfully stop ridiculous cases like this one.

I obviously don't agree with companies doing this but you have to ask the question, why wouldn't they do it? They certainly don't lose anything and that's what needs to change. Most larger companies usually have lawyers on retainer anyway. A few thousands dollars for the chance to get the name for cheap.

disaac81 · Jul 28, 2015

Shame, if they want it they should pay for it just like we all do.

Mr. Deleted · Jul 29, 2015

62 domains, this is his oldest, and there is one from 1999.

http://reversewhois.domaintools.com/?email=c49df478f887e4ca116efac75cf1f5ab

Mr. Deleted · Jul 29, 2015

BTW, Mr. Houllou has Houllou.com. Wish I had my last name as a .com, but he also owns SHE Advertising, the same company that has the parking page at the domain reseller page. It seems he keeps all his domains at that reseller account.

FPForum · Jul 29, 2015

I agree, this company belongs in the Hall of Shame! Probably won't be long before we see them listed there. On a side note, is it possible to counter-sue if someone files a UDRP and the case is denied? This is one of those cases you would like to see the instigating company not only lose this suit, but then have a new suit filed against them which they would be on the hook for.

information UDRP Filed Against Premium Domain iBuy.com

More options

Skyvisum

Top Member

Chetan

Top Member

Nazz

Top Member

xull

Established Member

GravityEleven

Top Member

NPer

Very Allergic to CURRYTop Member

pchip

Established Member

disaac81

Top Member

Mr. Deleted

Slabaugh.com 800-266-2728Top Member

Mr. Deleted

Slabaugh.com 800-266-2728Top Member

FPForum

Top Member

Similar threads

We're social

New posts

Auction activity

What non .com extensions have you sold in 2024?

Polls of interest

Popular this week

Community favorite

Popular this month

Blog favorites

Pinned

Appreciation

Agreement