Birds of a feather flock together...and how the mudslinging becomes a bad habit. If y'all thing you have coralled "reality", think again. All the arguments i hear are so specious it's hard to read.
Ok-again, you have no facts here.
Hair-splitting (ie going back to old threads, scrutinizing insignificant details and looking to those as pointers for the future) is such a waste of time. Yesterday was yesterday and today is today.
So how do you come with your valuations? Not looking at the past? You also recently said that .co and .com should not be compared. Was it not you who said .co is a 10% the price of the past .com sales? So you kinda covered this:
1. The past is important
2. .co and .com can be compared
So I suggest you scrutinze your
past posts in this very thread!! Or are your past posts not yours/or once again-it's irrelevant?
I would hate to see if you ever had a failed business what you would do if you wanted to start a new business. You wouldn't because the failure in the past, according to your logic, would necessiate future failure. Therefore, don't try any new business after your first has failed. How absurd.
So-only because YOU say so? :lol:
Any one here criticizing .co supporters, I would love to hear your first hand experience with your own start-up business venture, which .co is.
So you want to hear past experiences? I thought you weren't interested in that? Hmmm... contradiction of note! Actually tend to see everywhere.
Nubiano, take a look at any chart of any new, start-up company. There is always a rise in a hype face and then the line comes down and plateaus. At some point this will happen with .co. The only question will be where that plateau will be. That plateau, if the company is successful, will be followed by a steady rise. This whole phase thing is not revolutionary. And as a matter of fact, reason has nothing to do with it. It's just the course of a new business.
Emjohn, I am a Financial Analyst by trade. 7 years under the belt my boy!:D I am a member of the institute of financial markets in my country. I have written sooo many reports on listed companies used widely by stock and derivative traders during the height of the financial crisis:2008-2009, with an 85% success rate. I also have written many industry reports which were bought by industry giants. Now you know what I am... so let's have a look at what you called reading charts (actually called technical analysis)
Now-I am seriously sorry to embarrass you here in this thread, but you talk about "charts" and long winded sentences about them which doesn't make sense. That description of which you thought you gave of a chart was actually a description of a camels hump! :lol: Leave "chart reading" to the big boys, and I will leave fortune-telling to you!
You are of the idea that history is nonsense, then why point to charts? (Even though what you explained doesn't make sense. Can you please provide me with your future estimated growth, i.e. a month on month growth rate (taking two years into account)?)
Do you have experience in conducting research? Yet you try to rubbish me with your nonsense-did you seriously never think no one would catch on that you typing a load of nonsense? You know that what I am saying is true-it's only right I point this out.
As far as appraisals are concerned, it's a fairly easy thing. There already have been many
.co sales and rough estimates of the prices for .co have been made (see Michael Mann). Essentially we are talking about abstract prices and the need for a market maker, much like in stock trading. We will see in the next few months how valuable this .co "stock" is and what the Market Makers (like Michael Mann) deem the prices to be. The trickle-down affect will follow.
Mann is a business MANN!! He is only interested in the flip-seriously not dot co.
Dot co is only but a little sl_t in his portfolio, .COM is his real sweetie!! :loveyou:
But I guess you know a lot of business, etc.... please excuse me while you give your business perspective on this.
Last point, please don't compare "experienced domainers" ie default .com coat-tailers, with free enterprise entrepreneurs. The latter requires a totally different mindset from the former.
Okay-then promise me you will never talk about stocks, technical analysis and research methods. That's my area- and .co is your area. Don't mix the two when you base your predictions on your thoughts and not the past.
2. Sure, when you look at charts. Who could have forseen that gold would reach $1400? The strength of fundamentals can change the course of everything. It can wipe out the past and create the future in a much different way.
Again... I think you get what I'm trying to say by now.
What fundamentals are these dear Emjohn?
Gold went where it went because of the trading. You certainly know nothing of investing. Bullion was being traded more and more recently, and even more so now on gold companies by means of trading SSFs. It's a safe haven. Risky assets are less favorable these days. Gold is rare... Point of story-increased demand for a limited resource, price increases. Chinese demand is up for gold, and IMF has been selling bullion recently from reserves. Decreased mining in the recent years (financial crisis related). And millions of other variables play a role. Analysts around the world predicted higher gold prices. But if you had the slightest clue of investing-you would've known this... no surprise to the adults my boy.
DOT CO can't be compared to GOLD! :lol:
Nubiano :wave:
