domain saerch.mobi

[leslieprospers]

common type for search - some overture, google ad sense supported.

Please place some value, if any - Thanks everyone.

 

[domainer67]

I would have placed some value on it if it was a .com, but since people usually take much longer to type something in their cellphone, thus paying more attention to what they type, I would have to (unfortunately) say that this domain is worthless.

I hope you can prove me wrong!

 

[stever]

Leslie, my way of evaluating names which may have intrinsic value (rather than potential development value) is to look at them under two categories: one before and one after the dot.

1) is the content of the domain to the left of dot high-value?
e.g. one word or valuable two-word phrase
no hyphens or numbers
correctly-spelled or in correct order
2) is it .com (or correct language in relevant large country domain)?

Obviously, most of the domains that fulfill both criteria are already taken and many are high value. For me, a potential name can survive one minus mark, but not two. So saerch.com would have been OK, as would search.mobi, but saerch.mobi has two minus marks (one for misspelling, one for .mobi).

Many of your domains that you propose, including the ones today, fall at this hurdle. Perhaps this helps, perhaps not.

 

[leslieprospers]

Leslie, my way of evaluating names which may have intrinsic value (rather than potential development value) is to look at them under two categories: one before and one after the dot.

1) is the content of the domain to the left of dot high-value?
e.g. one word or valuable two-word phrase
no hyphens or numbers
correctly-spelled or in correct order
2) is it .com (or correct language in relevant large country domain)?

Obviously, most of the domains that fulfill both criteria are already taken and many are high value. For me, a potential name can survive one minus mark, but not two. So saerch.com would have been OK, as would search.mobi, but saerch.mobi has two minus marks (one for misspelling, one for .mobi).

Many of your domains that you propose, including the ones today, fall at this hurdle. Perhaps this helps, perhaps not.

Clearly understood. Thanks.

I would have placed some value on it if it was a .com, but since people usually take much longer to type something in their cellphone, thus paying more attention to what they type, I would have to (unfortunately) say that this domain is worthless.

I hope you can prove me wrong!

Don't you think it's the opposite - i.e., while driving you're more than likely to make a mistake on the word search on your cellphone. I would think there's more typos on a cell phone as opposed to any other device.