domain IberTours.com

[maya-zir]

Iber = Iberian Peninsula (Portugal + Spain)

 

[Future Sensors]

It depends on your overall portfolio and strategy.

How I'd price this one myself:

Increase the current BIN from 3,500 to 3,900, and trim max LTO periods so it doesn't exceed 7 months.

-or-

BIN at 2,500 with LTO capped at max 5 months (or: no LTO at all).

 

[maya-zir]

It depends on your overall portfolio and strategy.

How I'd price this one myself:

Increase the current BIN from 3,500 to 3,900, and trim max LTO periods so it doesn't exceed 7 months.

-or-

BIN at 2,500 with LTO capped at max 5 months (or: no LTO at all).

3500 or 3900 is the end user price.
Wouldn't reducing the number of LTO scare off potential buyers?
For BIN 3500 I usually set it to 35 LTO

 

[Future Sensors]

In my experience, the risk of buyers failing to complete all LTO payments rises sharply once monthly LTOs drop below $500. That's why I treat $500 as the absolute floor. Lower LTOs may look more attractive, but they tend to pull in less committed buyers. At the $2,500 price point, you can reasonably omit the LTO option entirely and present only the BIN. It still sits firmly in the highly affordable, impulse‑tier bracket. If different settings perform well on your end, feel free to retain them. I have no insight into your specific metrics or your broader portfolio‑level / STR / cash-flow strategy.

 

[Future Sensors]

Also, I'd not show Make Offer here.

 

[TonnyDomains]

In my experience, the risk of buyers failing to complete all LTO payments rises sharply once monthly LTOs drop below $500. That's why I treat $500 as the absolute floor. Lower LTOs may look more attractive, but they tend to pull in less committed buyers. At the $2,500 price point, you can reasonably omit the LTO option entirely and present only the BIN. It still sits firmly in the highly affordable, impulse‑tier bracket. If different settings perform well on your end, feel free to retain them. I have no insight into your specific metrics or your broader portfolio‑level / STR / cash-flow strategy.

Thank you for your information.

 

[TonnyDomains]

Also, I'd not show Make Offer here.

Where is it best to make offer?

 

[Future Sensors]

Where is it best to make offer?

Within the domain‑investing community, there are several schools of thought on this. My position is that once you display a BIN price, you generally should not also offer a Make Offer option. Presenting both simultaneously signals, implicitly but unmistakably, that the BIN is not truly firm and is instead a negotiable placeholder. It also tends to show a degree of uncertainty on the Seller's side, because the presence of a Make Offer button subtly exhibits that the BIN may not be final.

For domains priced in the impulse‑buy bracket, genuinely affordable assets where the buyer's decision cycle is short, the goal is to have the buyer click the BIN button and complete the purchase immediately, without drifting into hesitation, reconsideration or (the risk of) negotiating. Every additional decision point, whether it's an LTO option or a Make Offer pathway, adds cognitive friction. What looks like "more flexibility" on paper often becomes "more doubt" in practice.

Research on buyer behavior consistently shows that reducing alternatives accelerates decision‑making. Too many choices may appear attractive from a theoretical standpoint, but simplicity, as few pathways as possible, is what actually moves buyers toward a faster, cleaner purchase.

 

[maya-zir]

Also, I'd not show Make Offer here.

Ok, there is logic here, because after paying 5-6 payments, the buyer may change their mind or the project may close in a year or 2 and there will be no point in continuing to pay....
I need to think about what amount is best to set as a monthly payment.
I usually active the "make offer" option to see how potential buyers value the domain.

 

[nexilo]

Within the domain‑investing community, there are several schools of thought on this. My position is that once you display a BIN price, you generally should not also offer a Make Offer option. Presenting both simultaneously signals, implicitly but unmistakably, that the BIN is not truly firm and is instead a negotiable placeholder. It also tends to show a degree of uncertainty on the Seller's side, because the presence of a Make Offer button subtly exhibits that the BIN may not be final.

For domains priced in the impulse‑buy bracket, genuinely affordable assets where the buyer's decision cycle is short, the goal is to have the buyer click the BIN button and complete the purchase immediately, without drifting into hesitation, reconsideration or (the risk of) negotiating. Every additional decision point, whether it's an LTO option or a Make Offer pathway, adds cognitive friction. What looks like "more flexibility" on paper often becomes "more doubt" in practice.

Research on buyer behavior consistently shows that reducing alternatives accelerates decision‑making. Too many choices may appear attractive from a theoretical standpoint, but simplicity, as few pathways as possible, is what actually moves buyers toward a faster, cleaner purchase.

What about Just make an offer. No BIN or other options. Is it good?

 

[Future Sensors]

What about Just make an offer. No BIN or other options. Is it good?

Although I personally use a BIN strategy for all my domains (often combined with LTO), Make Offer can absolutely be effective, depending on your strategy, types of domains you're working with, and willingness to negotiate.

A BIN generally gives you broader distribution at Afternic partners, Sedo partners, Atom partners, and the wider registrar network, which all surface BIN‑priced inventory. If you rely solely on Make Offer, you lose that extra layer of visibility.

Make Offer does have an important advantage. You can engage directly with leads, negotiate, and even re‑open old leads after some time has passed. For certain categories of domains, that negotiation flow is valuable.

With Afternic, the configuration is flexible. You can show Make Offer on the lander, while simultaneously setting a BIN that remains hidden on the lander but is fully visible across GoDaddy and Afternic partners. But if you skip setting a BIN entirely, you also lose access to LTO, which requires a BIN to exist.

There are many viable combinations, and it's worth testing a specific configuration for a defined period to see how it performs for your portfolio.

 

[TonnyDomains]

Although I personally use a BIN strategy for all my domains (often combined with LTO), Make Offer can absolutely be effective, depending on your strategy, types of domains you're working with, and willingness to negotiate.

A BIN generally gives you broader distribution at Afternic partners, Sedo partners, Atom partners, and the wider registrar network, which all surface BIN‑priced inventory. If you rely solely on Make Offer, you lose that extra layer of visibility.

Make Offer does have an important advantage. You can engage directly with leads, negotiate, and even re‑open old leads after some time has passed. For certain categories of domains, that negotiation flow is valuable.

With Afternic, the configuration is flexible. You can show Make Offer on the lander, while simultaneously setting a BIN that remains hidden on the lander but is fully visible across GoDaddy and Afternic partners. But if you skip setting a BIN entirely, you also lose access to LTO, which requires a BIN to exist.

There are many viable combinations, and it's worth testing a specific configuration for a defined period to see how it performs for your portfolio.

I general I only use BIN for domains with a relative low price.
And "Make Offer" for higher priced.

 

[Future Sensors]

I general I only use BIN for domains with a relative low price.
And "Make Offer" for higher priced.

I don't have the ability to prevent you from taking that course of action.