keirongraffie said:
jeff my logic is cio.com is making millions right know & an copresident would be above an cio.
You are saying that in a company/corporation, a copresident holds a higher position that a cio/ceo. This is true, but we are talking about domains here, not company positions or the salaries for them. CIO/CEO are not only valuable because the acronyms are common and well known, but also because they are excellent 3-letter domains. Because of that, they would still have great value even if the terms themselves had never existed. On the flipside, copresident in neither a common term nor a 3-letter domain. There is no comparison.
keirongraffie said:
with enough funding copresident.com could sell there own magazine, ebooks,news, blogs,email, intercommunication with other copresidents & the same stuff as cfo.com.
With enough funding, just about anything, or any term can be built into a successful brand. That's not the issue though.
keirongraffie said:
all the other extension would be cybersquatting
No they wouldn't. If that was the case, we would all be out of business. Unless there is a trademark or copyright situation, people are free to register, buy and sell practically any generic term.
I thought it was as good as rock.com.
Ask yourself this; how often have you seen or heard the word 'rock'? How often have you seen or heard the word 'copresident'? They are miles apart and there is no comparison.
All that being said, I don't think the domain is worthless. Like similar terms 'co-owner' 'cofounder' (etc.) it's a real word and it does have it's uses. Realistically though, they would seem to be limited, and certainly nowhere near the other examples you gave.
I guess what I'm trying to say is; don't order that new BMW yet, based on the sale of this domain.
All due respect. I wish you good luck.