Cheapest .UK.COMs?

[Russkie]

Guys, where are the cheapest .UK.COMs? Any ideas? Thanks in advance

 

[lothos]

a .uk.com isn't a real domain extension, it's a subdomain sold by a third party. Personally I wouldn't buy one.

 

[Russkie]

Thank you, I know, but have something in mind Pityingly, the prices what I see (123-reg) are quite disappointing, must be promos on the web. Did anyone hear anything? Thanks in advance.

 

[barefoottech]

Personally I wouldn't buy one.

I wouldn't have for FREE

Thank you, I know, but have something in mind Pityingly, the prices what I see (123-reg) are quite disappointing, must be promos on the web. Did anyone hear anything? Thanks in advance.

Re-think your plans, UK.COM is never a good choice for a site.

 

[miller]

uk.com’s resale is very doubtful, end users are simply not interested in them ? Domainers know they are not a true extension just a sub domain… Listing high is very unlikely plus google has changed the way it perceives/ scores emd’s another downer, The new proposed .uk cctld makes them doubly so all in not worth regging or developing unless you have money and time to through away then there perfect….

 

[Russkie]

Thanks, gentlemen

Thanks, gentlemen, after reading all this, I will definitely follow your logic. I doubt the idea I’d thought about. Thank you!..

 

[Catch.Center]

1and1 is good for .co.uk

 

[ioana_bv]

unfortunately the registry is keeping the prices too high for .UK.com and .UK.net
I would not consider .UK.com that bad as mentioned before. I have seen great sites with .UK.com. This TLD is good when you have the exact keyword you need, otherwise .co.UK is the best choice.
At www.domain.gs this For costs around $40-$45
Good luck

 

[wonderfulsites]

Wait for the new .UK extension that be available in 2013.

Sent via Android