NameSilo

.tv buyoled.tv

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch
Impact
1,166
I have finaly got my money on account and could reg some hot domains prepared on list to reg.

hope it worts to reg. fee

thanks for ideas and appraisal

I have read somewhere that in 2008 in oled will be a lot of money.

roko
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Unstoppable Domains โ€” AI StorefrontUnstoppable Domains โ€” AI Storefront
after 6 hours no reply - looks I am totaly wrong in this tv dn.

but even it is the worstest dn you ever seen - I would like to know it

especialy from the TV experts here on board ,-)

thank for opinion
 
0
•••
It is not a bad name at all, but just reg fee for now.
Good luck :)
 
0
•••
what is oled ?

all i saw when i saw the name was possibly someone couldn't spell boiled?!.. i thought to myself, damn - that persons had a nightmare ! :hehe:
 
0
•••
ok here is clue:

An OLED display thus emits its own light. LCDs require a separate backlight. The image you see on your LCD is created when thousands of transistors open an aperture in a matrix of liquid crystals, allowing the backlight to shine through, like a window blind. That's the reason you have to face an LCD straight on to see it well, and why you can't see it well outside.

Because they're emissive rather than transmissive, OLEDs are sharper and brighter than LCDs. For this same reason, you can clearly see them even if you're peering at them from one side or the other. And that visual superiority isn't their only virtue. OLEDs are also:

Thinner and lighter. With no backlight and fewer layers of glass, OLEDs are little thicker than a dime--about a third the thickness of an LCD.
Better for video. Because OLEDs refresh about 1 million times a second--as much as 1,000 times faster than some LCDs--moving images are much crisper.

Kimberly Allen, a market researcher with iSuppli/Stanford Resources that follows display technologies, isn't. But she's bullish on OLEDs, too, characterizing them as the "biggest up-and-coming player" among several emanating display technologies. Her firm predicts that the market for OLEDs could reach $2.3 billion by 2008.

http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=18250758

shortly: next TV technology after plasma and lcd
 
Last edited:
0
•••
rokoroko said:
ok here is clue:

An OLED display thus emits its own light. LCDs require a separate backlight. The image you see on your LCD is created when thousands of transistors open an aperture in a matrix of liquid crystals, allowing the backlight to shine through, like a window blind. That's the reason you have to face an LCD straight on to see it well, and why you can't see it well outside.

Because they're emissive rather than transmissive, OLEDs are sharper and brighter than LCDs. For this same reason, you can clearly see them even if you're peering at them from one side or the other. And that visual superiority isn't their only virtue. OLEDs are also:

Thinner and lighter. With no backlight and fewer layers of glass, OLEDs are little thicker than a dime--about a third the thickness of an LCD.
Better for video. Because OLEDs refresh about 1 million times a second--as much as 1,000 times faster than some LCDs--moving images are much crisper.

Kimberly Allen, a market researcher with iSuppli/Stanford Resources that follows display technologies, isn't. But she's bullish on OLEDs, too, characterizing them as the "biggest up-and-coming player" among several emanating display technologies. Her firm predicts that the market for OLEDs could reach $2.3 billion by 2008.

http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=18250758

shortly: next TV technology after plasma and lcd

Right on! OLEDs will be hot!
 
0
•••
organic LED...... nice domain.
 
0
•••
Reg Fee for now.
 
0
•••
but boiled tv is joke of the day - I am tempted to reg it.

perfect sense of humor from domainer to domainer - :)

we make a fun here!!
 
0
•••
Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
NameMaxi - Your Domain Has Buyers
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back