- Impact
- 364
Registrar : Dynadot
IDN's : Puny Codes Added
Price : $175 ( FOR ALL )
Payment : Paypal
Transfer : Push Preferred ( Auth Code Available except For answer.global )
Renewal : Regular (Non-premium)
BEST OPPORTUNITY !
I like it, I think is a pretty playful combo!
Domain has standard renewal for .tube, which is around 25 - 30 at many registrars. It was first registered in May 2018, a month ago. It was never registred or dropped before. .Tube is in GA (General availability) since July 2016, but I still think it is a good combo.
My feeling is that if someone likes it, it can go for 2k-5k with probability of resale in this range as 1%, as it is kind of new gTLD brandable name. I have just googled that there are several end users using the "cine tube" string, and your domain name would be an perfect upgrade for some of them, imo. End user pool is pretty large, but the name needs exposure, as not many people will seach exactly for it. But after they see it, they might like it.
In general, in new gTLD area, best investments are such where odds for profit are dramatically shifted in favour of domain investor (which means that projected profit per year, calculated as realistic resale price multilplied by probability of resale for this price in any given year of holding, is 10-100 times more then cost per year of holding).
Anyone who manage to get such odds for their domain names will simply fall in love with new gTLDs.
Vice - verca, if the odds are shifted against domain investor, the result will be sure financial loss over time. Many such investors will then (after years of losses) start blaming new gTLD names, greedy registrars, greedy registries, ICANN, etc - basically everyone except themselves.
And when the odds are balanced, it is lot of work, but basically no real profit for a domain investor. Also not very good outcome.
Stil, it is very nice and innovative name
IDN's : Puny Codes Added
Price : $175 ( FOR ALL )
Payment : Paypal
Transfer : Push Preferred ( Auth Code Available except For answer.global )
Renewal : Regular (Non-premium)
BEST OPPORTUNITY !
- ȧ.com xn--dma.com 2018/10/07
- ɪᴛ.com xn--9na087k.com 2018/11/01
- ɢᴀᴍᴇ.com xn--1na247kvax.com 2018/11/01
- texasholdempoker.co 2018/12/28
- thecrypto.cc 2019/01/23
- ⲟ.com xn--zhj.com 2019/03/08
- ⲥ.com xn--5hj.com 2019/03/08
- ⲣ.com xn--3hj.com 2019/03/08
- ⲍ.com xn--hhj.com 2019/03/08
- ᛐ.net xn--hxe.net 2019/03/09
- ߗ.com xn--ysb.com 2019/03/09
- bitcoinexchange.store 2019/03/10
- 𐤱.com xn--bl9c.com 2019/03/11
- crypt.website 2019/03/11
- cryptobiz.co.uk 2019/03/13
- airfare.center 2019/03/15
- sms.haus 2019/04/01
- xxx.partners 2019/04/25
- best.voyage 2019/04/25
- poker.style 2019/05/01
- cine.tube 2019/05/10
- forum.forsale 2019/05/20
- turk.tube 2019/06/22
- domainstore.site 2019/06/22
- webmaster.zone 2019/06/27
- answer.global 2019/07/17
I like it, I think is a pretty playful combo!
Domain has standard renewal for .tube, which is around 25 - 30 at many registrars. It was first registered in May 2018, a month ago. It was never registred or dropped before. .Tube is in GA (General availability) since July 2016, but I still think it is a good combo.
My feeling is that if someone likes it, it can go for 2k-5k with probability of resale in this range as 1%, as it is kind of new gTLD brandable name. I have just googled that there are several end users using the "cine tube" string, and your domain name would be an perfect upgrade for some of them, imo. End user pool is pretty large, but the name needs exposure, as not many people will seach exactly for it. But after they see it, they might like it.
In general, in new gTLD area, best investments are such where odds for profit are dramatically shifted in favour of domain investor (which means that projected profit per year, calculated as realistic resale price multilplied by probability of resale for this price in any given year of holding, is 10-100 times more then cost per year of holding).
Anyone who manage to get such odds for their domain names will simply fall in love with new gTLDs.
Vice - verca, if the odds are shifted against domain investor, the result will be sure financial loss over time. Many such investors will then (after years of losses) start blaming new gTLD names, greedy registrars, greedy registries, ICANN, etc - basically everyone except themselves.
And when the odds are balanced, it is lot of work, but basically no real profit for a domain investor. Also not very good outcome.
Stil, it is very nice and innovative name
Last edited:
