.tv Big.tv sold for $1,410!

[Ammudamus]

Big.tv sold for $1,410 at Namejet!

Note: Not affiliated to sale.

 

[Casey L]

Would have expected more, although I imagine if it were mine I wouldn't be so picky with offers

 

[WhoaDomain.com]

very strange that it did not sell for more.

perhaps wrong timing on starting the auction?

or owner did not actively promote on Namebio and the usual spots?

 

[kemjika11]

sold for cash and not for value.outlier sale? prolly. might be a huger undersell.

 

[Brand Consultants]

Would have paid at least 2k for this name... (it's worth much more)

 

[Ammudamus]

very strange that it did not sell for more.

perhaps wrong timing on starting the auction?

or owner did not actively promote on Namebio and the usual spots?

The name expired.

A

 

[Candace]

This name is definitely worth more.

Sold in 2011 for $1550 on Snapnames, now in 2017 for $1410 on Namejet.

This name is underselling imo. It spans the dot extremely well.

 

[Ammudamus]

This name is definitely worth more.

Sold in 2011 for $1550 on Snapnames, now in 2017 for $1410 on Namejet.

This name is underselling imo. It spans the dot extremely well.

Candace,
The name never sold on Snapnames in 2011 as the buyer defaulted. Moniker/Snapnames held the name for many years without selling. I do agree that it should have sold for more.

A

 

[Brand Consultants]

Maybe it has a premium renewal or something?

 

[Candace]

Candace,
The name never sold on Snapnames in 2011 as the buyer defaulted. Moniker/Snapnames held the name for many years without selling. I do agree that it should have sold for more.

A

Makes me wonder now how many of the sales reported on Namebio weren't completed.

Namebio is still showing it as sold in 2011.

Thanks for letting us know.

 

[ikhub]

It was a real big loss for the seller. There are recent sales over 2K for quite a number of not so popular words in .TV

 

[Ammudamus]

Maybe it has a premium renewal or something?

No premium renewal. They can not be sold on Namejet with a premium.