Good keyword, except as said the .in hurts the price. If targetted towards the .in crowd, it would be worth a nice share, maybe low $xx to mid $xx, but now reg fee.
Will decline on an amt- I don't have .in figured out yet. However, I like the keyword and think it is worthy on development. Although some of my colleagues would disagree, I like using play on words using exts for *branding* applications. ie "Acreage.in/Alaska"