Hemanttilotia
Established Member
- Impact
- 1,008
Hi
Our team at smeloan.com, is soon launching an ICO for the sale of our token, Sapphire.
We would first open up token sale privately and then the ICO through our Delaware listed entity.
The problem is that we have been using the name, Sapphire, for the token internally and in the coding as well ( it's based on Ethereum, but will be moving to Neo platform), and 'Sapphire coin' on Google gives different search results, which in my experience would be very difficult to beat to the first page.
Do you guys agree with this?
Should we change the name of the token before private placement of the tokens?
It would be for the US markets.
Hemant
Our team at smeloan.com, is soon launching an ICO for the sale of our token, Sapphire.
We would first open up token sale privately and then the ICO through our Delaware listed entity.
The problem is that we have been using the name, Sapphire, for the token internally and in the coding as well ( it's based on Ethereum, but will be moving to Neo platform), and 'Sapphire coin' on Google gives different search results, which in my experience would be very difficult to beat to the first page.
Do you guys agree with this?
Should we change the name of the token before private placement of the tokens?
It would be for the US markets.
Hemant
Last edited:
