IT.COM

Registrars now blocking registration of dropped domains

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
Impact
29
GoDaddy says they're now place a 48-hour hold on new registrations of domains that expired.

I didn't call NameCheap, but based on how their site is treating dropped domains, they're also doing the same thing.

Anyone else running into this issue?
 
2
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
1
•••
Wow -- is it over? I'm seeing domains available again.
 
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
Nope - I spoke too soon. Bunch of domains showed as available -- then I searched again and they're all "not available".
 
0
•••
0
•••
I posted this on Twitter to try and show @GoDaddyHelp what is going on:

https://twitter.com/BodhiNat/status/587326513567109121

GoDaddy vs Namecom Availability - png.png
 
3
•••
could this be a situation where the initial search for availability actually puts the domain "on hold" for a while?
 
3
•••
could this be a situation where the initial search for availability actually puts the domain "on hold" for a while?


hmmm... all dropped domains are on "hold" until exactly 8:00:00 PM UTC.... This was not the case a few days ago...
 
0
•••
I had this happen today. I chatted with GD support and they were useless without an actual domain to look at. I explained that i already regged it elsewhere etc. But they just didn't get it.
 
1
•••
I had this happen today. I chatted with GD support and they were useless without an actual domain to look at. I explained that i already regged it elsewhere etc. But they just didn't get it.

Or they're using that classic bad customer support tactic: if you can't convince 'em, confuse 'em. And If you can confuse 'em, just play dumb.
 
1
•••
All this (And a few dick moves they took with their API a few days ago) are motivated and aimed through making people use their backordering service more and more.

What t hey don't know unfortunately (Or choose to ignore) that their Backordering service simply good for nothing. They just assume that by simply having a poorly coded backordering platform will beat those of dyna, pheenix or heck, even snap/namejet as they are the biggeest and powerful registrar. It will take a long time to those dumb ears to realize things don't translate like this in the real world.
 
1
•••
this might reduce the amount of domains "hand snapped" by domainers using 99cent codes.

those would be money-losers for G.
 
1
•••
All this (And a few dick moves they took with their API a few days ago) are motivated and aimed through making people use their backordering service more and more.

What t hey don't know unfortunately (Or choose to ignore) that their Backordering service simply good for nothing. They just assume that by simply having a poorly coded backordering platform will beat those of dyna, pheenix or heck, even snap/namejet as they are the biggeest and powerful registrar. It will take a long time to those dumb ears to realize things don't translate like this in the real world.

GoDaddy Backorders cannot even beat a hand-reg at Godaddy. That's how bad they are. I once back-ordered a domain at GoDaddy and was beaten by a Godaddy hand-reg. Who do you think ordered the domain first, me or the hand-regger? Something seriously wrong with their backorder service, right there.
 
1
•••
WTF!!???
2mfx6ck.jpg






It seems that ALL registrars are blocking now dropped domains during the drop-time... :-/
 
0
•••
WTF!!???
2mfx6ck.jpg






It seems that ALL registrars are blocking now dropped domains during the drop-time... :-/
strange however i just checked a domain that dropped today and it shows as available on namesilo.
 
0
•••
I dunno... Now it is 12:03 PM PT and I can check and register fresh drops with name silo
 
0
•••
I dunno... Now it is 12:03 PM PT and I can check and register fresh drops with name silo
I don't normally use namesilo but I'd be curious to know why they are doing that.
 
0
•••
I fear all registrars will block the drops during the drop-catch time :-/
 
0
•••
Yep, happened again today. this time i grabbed some ridiculous long name that nobody would want and contacted support. After being rejected yesterday for not having an example, I had the misguided enthusiasm that lead me to believe I would here of a policy change or some official word. The CS rep knew nothing, opened a help ticket and said thanks. I know that when the ticket gets looked at, the tech will try the domain in and it will work fine because enough time has passed.

I ended up having to register somewhere else so it was a direct loss to GD. people like me who register something nearly every day, will add up to a lot of lost revenue for GD as we move elsewhere.
 
2
•••
I fear all registrars will block the drops during the drop-catch time :-/

I bet NameBright/DropCatch are not blocking these domains dropping domains. If every other registrar is blocking them, then it leaves DropCatch an open field without any competition. (Although I know that by the time it gets to hand-regging a domain by us mere mortals, DropCatch have finished already for the day).
 
Last edited:
1
•••
I fear all registrars will block the drops during the drop-catch time :-/
unless it becomes icann policy there is no benefit for any registrar without a backorder service to do this.
 
2
•••
I haven't reg'd a domain in a while and tried to hand reg a dropped name and GD said unavailable although whois showed available. Rushed to NP, of course, to find out wtf is going on. Then reg'd the name with NameSilo :) Anyway, strange indeed.
 
1
•••
It looks like they are all going in on it together: seems anti-competitive to me, like price-fixing.
 
0
•••
It looks like they are all going in on it together: seems anti-competitive to me, like price-fixing.

Does this include NameBright? I'd be surprised, if it does.
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back