A poll for LLLL.com Investors

nice pool, Reece!!!
i have already voted

bricio said:

nice pool, Reece!!!
i have already voted

Click to expand...

Thanks Bricio

It'd be great if someone made one for L-L-L.coms too. We could then compare the two later and see if there are similarities between those who chose to invest in LLLL.coms and those who chose to invest in L-L-L.coms.

Reece, I clicked too fast before really reading the brackets. Where's the "less than 50 names" bracket?

I own less than 50, and I'm 30 yrs. old

Very interesting poll. Voted too.

No slot for me so cant vote,

seanboy said:

I own less than 50, and I'm 30 yrs. old

Click to expand...

Me too, but as about 35 voted in the section for 50+.
Im 30+ too
:sold:

A big thank you goes out to everyone who's taken a couple minutes of their time to vote so far

PowerUp said:

Reece, I clicked too fast before really reading the brackets. Where's the "less than 50 names" bracket?

Click to expand...

Unfortunately, polls are limited to a maximum of 12 options. I'll include it in a future poll, as it seems we have many domainers who fall into that category as well.

I am less than 25 owns under 50 LLLL, LL-L, and L-LL domains.....

I am 22, and own about 200 LLLL's currently.

Thanks Bricio

It'd be great if someone made one for L-L-L.coms too. We could then compare the two later and see if there are similarities between those who chose to invest in LLLL.coms and those who chose to invest in L-L-L.coms.

Click to expand...

i thought exactly this when i saw your pool

Interesting poll.
Just curious about the age gap spread. Is 30+ already consider'ed "very old" in this industry?
(I was expecting a more evenly spread through'out the actual man's life span in the real world)

From most people I've talked to about LLLL.coms, not many of them seem to be 40+. I think other categories such as high priced names, high traffic names, .mobi and .tv (examples that come to mind) have a larger share of older domainers than LLLL.coms.

However, I'd be happy to include it in a future poll if we have a large number of older domainers whom I haven't accounted for.

Silhouette said:

Interesting poll.
Just curious about the age gap spread. Is 30+ already consider'ed "very old" in this industry?
(I was expecting a more evenly spread through'out the actual man's life span in the real world)

Click to expand...

Reece said:

I think other categories such as high priced names, high traffic names, .mobi and .tv (examples that come to mind) have a larger share of older domainers than LLLL.coms.

Click to expand...

wow.. interesting. Never know that. Thanks

Great Poll. Good work Reece. I can't wait to see the results. Like your blog said, this will definitely help to determine what would happen around next summer, leading into August/September when many (10,000+) domains will need to be renewed.

NICE, i'm 30, n owned 110+ LLLL domains.

Yep very interesting poll.
Keep up the good work Reece, A lot of new things to learn from you

Netizen

Alot of LLLL.com investors seem to be right around 30 years of age -- the primary reason I made the second age bracket 25-30, rather than being 25-35, encompassing 10 years like the former.

That's a good sign imho. It's a nice age... Good job, stable income, no worrying about paying for your kids college education for a long time

Reece said:

Good job, stable income,

Click to expand...

speak for youself lol
:hehe:

interesting thread idea though Reece, rep added

speaking about number of llll.coms owned isn't really a good indicator as long as you don't consider quality, imho.

ilcesco said:

speaking about number of llll.coms owned isn't really a good indicator as long as you don't consider quality, imho.

Click to expand...

Most of the higher quality names gained considerably from the LLLL.com buyout. If I were to sell my 1500 LLLL.com for $7 next year and convince another 10 people with equally large portfolios to do the same, yes, I very much do think it could bring down the prices of every single LLLL.com.

That may sound farfetched, but there really are a good 10k+ bad lettered LLLL.coms set to expire over the summer -- and alot more afterwards.

If we assume that supply of bad lettered LLLL.coms influences buyer behaviour towards premium LLLL.coms, then we can conclude that it's in everyone's interest to not only make sure the buyout holds, but that cheap LLLL.coms are never on the market.

With a triple premium + Q fetching $20, it's not hard to justify paying $30 or so for a triple premium + J. If that triple premium + Q falls to $7, are you really going to pay 400% more just so you can have that J?

I don't know... We'll really have to see what happens, but I think it's in everyone's best efforts to analyze the entire LLLL.com market and not the small segment (eg. premiums, CVCV, VCVC, ...) they're invested in.

voted. Nice poll.

I voted

Interesting poll indeed

Voted.