Ads for Escrowly - really?

Namecheap AuctionsNamecheap Auctions
Namecheap AuctionsNamecheap Auctions
Spacemail by SpaceshipSpacemail by Spaceship
Watch
Impact
4,976
I see that new crypto escrow company Escrowly is now advertising on namePros. I wonder if that is a good decision made by @NamePros. As @jberryhill has pointed out on X, they are using a complete copy of Escrow.com's website - down to the amount in the example transaction - and use a Gmail as their Whois contact email. There also seem to be license issues.

Skærmbillede 2026-09-11 104001.png


Skærmbillede 2026-09-11 103946.png
 
39
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
Reddit assigned that username when the account was created, and we should have changed it to something clearly identifiable as Escrowly. That is on us, we even paid for a subscription, but I guess it will take time or something to make it done.
This reads as either a genuine misunderstanding of how Reddit works, or a fabricated excuse to explain away an awkward detail. And given the thread's established pattern (retracted false claims, an insider posing as a customer, swapped reviews, etc.), the latter is the more consistent read.
 
7
•••
Imagine if Escrow.com's official corporate account had been posting under u/xX_Trader420_Xx for years and then said they were "working on it". It would rightly be seen as a joke, not a minor oversight.
 
5
•••
The .org version is reserved to only those who have been contacted by Nigerian princes.
I do not know if they have prince or kingdom there :)
 
0
•••
This reads as either a genuine misunderstanding of how Reddit works, or a fabricated excuse to explain away an awkward detail. And given the thread's established pattern (retracted false claims, an insider posing as a customer, swapped reviews, etc.), the latter is the more consistent read.

I understand the comparison, The Reddit account was created before we had a proper branded Reddit presence, and the username was never changed to reflect Escrowly. Looking back, we should have made the account clearly identifiable from the beginning. That is a fair criticism.

But I would separate that from the other issues you mentioned. We have already acknowledged and corrected the marketing material claim.

We are not claiming that we have handled everything perfectly. We haven’t. We are correcting what needs correcting and continuing to build the company.

People can decide for themselves whether they want to use Escrowly. We are happy to answer legitimate questions and let the platform speak for itself!
 
1
•••
We love hearing input and yes we welcome the critics too.

We also have some new jobs and opportunities coming soon. We are still early, so we are not going to offer crazy salaries 😂 but yes, they will be paid opportunities.

We are building, things are going well, and there is a lot more coming!! Would be great to have some people from the community join us along the way.
 
0
•••
1
•••
Every correction in this thread, the 1M+ user count, the "backed by law" marketing language, the fake reviews, now the Reddit handle, followed the same sequence. Get caught, concede the smallest piece that's undeniable, then move on as if the rest is settled.

That's not learning. Learning would mean catching this yourselves before members had to prove it with screenshots.

Nothing about the pattern is resolved by fixing what's already been caught. The license numbers, the real estate licensing question, the fake reviews, many questions are all still open.

A company whose entire pitch is "trust us with your money", dressed up in shiny Instagram graphics, doesn't get to treat each proven issue as a closed chapter while everything else quietly sits unanswered.

The bar for an escrow platform is set far higher than for some small boutique selling clothes online. Especially when you keep emphasizing that you're courting clients looking to move high-value items.

At this point the pattern itself is the red flag, not any one item in isolation.
 
Last edited:
19
•••
Every correction in this thread, the 1M+ user count, the "backed by law" marketing language, the fake reviews, now the Reddit handle, followed the same sequence. Get caught, concede the smallest piece that's undeniable, then move on as if the rest is settled.

That's not learning. Learning would mean catching this yourselves before members had to prove it with screenshots.

Nothing about the pattern is resolved by fixing what's already been caught. The license numbers, the real estate licensing question, the fake reviews, many questions are all still open.

A company whose entire pitch is "trust us with your money", dressed up in shiny Instagram graphics, doesn't get to treat each proven issue as a closed chapter while everything else quietly sits unanswered.

The bar for an escrow platform is set far higher than for some small boutique selling clothes online. Especially when you keep emphasizing that you're courting clients looking to move high-value items.

At this point the pattern itself is the red flag, not any one item in isolation.
Thank you for sharing your detailed concerns. :xf.smile:

We completely understand that trust is very important, especially when it comes to escrow and high-value transactions. This is exactly why we take all feedback from the community very seriously.

As mentioned previously, whenever something is brought to our attention, we review it carefully and take the necessary action if required. We believe making corrections and improvements is a positive thing and shows that we are listening to the community. :xf.smile:

Regarding the other points you mentioned, including licensing, reviews, real estate, and Reddit, these matters have either been addressed previously or are being reviewed by our team. We will continue to provide clarification where and when necessary.

No company is perfect, especially while growing, but what matters is how a company responds, learns, and improves. Our focus remains on building a safe, transparent, and reliable escrow platform for everyone.

We appreciate your continued feedback and support. :xf.smile:

You are always welcome to use Escrowly for your next transaction and let us know about your experience. We believe the best way to judge our service is by experiencing it yourself. :xf.smile:
 
Last edited:
5
•••
Disrespectful? Maybe.

This audience being played like fiddles? Never.
Hi

you can be played and not even know, until someone tells you

take this “service” for instance

let’s say, this audience if full of bobblehead idiots or folks who are just part of the silent majority
and if that were true then this thread wouldn’t exist, as is.

so, because there are quite a few who do speak up, who will ask questions and who can read and interpret meanings, from shit that dont mean 💩, then bullshit gets corrected or rejected….here on np

if I want to throw some crap out here, be sure it will gets sniffed out

and that’s how we get played, by fixing other mofo’s 🐂 💩 for free.

all done in the name of protecting the community from potential scams

imo…
 
4
•••
Last edited:
4
•••
Last edited:
6
•••
0
•••
Last edited:
2
•••
Please read carefully.

Thanks to all.

Cheers


Escrowly_Terms_Conditions.png
 
0
•••
It actually makes the case for us. You disclaim being a real escrow service, disclaim guaranteeing any outcome, and say "escrow" is just descriptive with no implied affiliation to actual escrow providers. That's the opposite of "Trade With Legal Confidence". Which one is it?
 
5
•••
"Escrow" is literally in your company name, and your own terms say that doesn't mean you actually function as one.

That's not a small detail, that's your whole pitch falling apart.
 
8
•••
Fact Checked.png
 
5
•••
Escrowly Exhibit 020.png
 
5
•••
Escrowly Exhibit 021.png
 
1
•••
perfect sure also this too:


trademark_1.png
 
0
•••
Olitt — high-converting AI websites, only from $1/moOlitt — high-converting AI websites, only from $1/mo

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Escrowly
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
Catchy
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back