IT.COM

UNREAL: 1.2 TB 100 GB b/w per month, 3 GB space ... $3!??

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
Here:

www.WebHostingBuzz.com

I was with them once but moved to PolurNet just because I outgrew my hosting plan and WHB was still BRAND SPANKIN NEW.

Now I see this plan...

geesh!

I would recommend them but I'm committed to polurnet.
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Seems a bit too cheap for me.

Plus, it doesn't look like they accept paypal, which is a neccessity for me.

Stephen
 
0
•••
Hm, you're right, they don't accept PP. That's dumb - accepting PP is easier than accepting ANY credit card...
 
0
•••
I have submitted a support ticket asking if they accept paypal or not.....

Stephen
 
0
•••
Hmm, 1.8TB bandwith a month for $5? They have to be just hoping noone will use that much... I cant expect this to last.

My dedicated server doesnt even have that....

Edit - Misread that, its 150gb month. 1.8TB year. That sounds much better
 
Last edited:
0
•••
tgo said:
Hmm, 1.8TB bandwith a month for $5? They have to be just hoping noone will use that much... I cant expect this to last.

My dedicated server doesnt even have that....

Edit - Misread that, its 150gb month. 1.8TB year. That sounds much better

100 GB/150 GB bandwidth a month for $5 is still considered a too good to be true offer therefore I'd consider it pretty much the same at 1.2 TB a month.
 
0
•••
Well I don't like to talk about any other forums, but just search at WHT and you'll see a bunch of realities of the company.

Do you actually think their service would be at par with companies offering "normal" packages? Experience and background info on the company says clearly 'no' :)

If it's too good to be true, it probably is. Don't fall into the trap of a design of the website, we've seen many 'hosts' here on NP that left abruptly even when having a nice site.
 
0
•••
PolurNET said:
Well I don't like to talk about any other forums, but just search at WHT and you'll see a bunch of realities of the company.

Do you actually think their service would be at par with companies offering "normal" packages? Experience and background info on the company says clearly 'no' :)

If it's too good to be true, it probably is. Don't fall into the trap of a design of the website, we've seen many 'hosts' here on NP that left abruptly even when having a nice site.

Actually PolurNET last night when I saw this post I attempted to actually find out more information in regards to their services and there is NOTHING bad about their services. BUT they do have a very strict ToS/AuP ;).
 
0
•••
I tend to agree with PolurNET, silly prices like that, they won't be round too long, seems they are desperate for business, i myself as a webhost offer "normal" packages and am doing just fine, you get what you pay for really sometimes and then some.

People start up a hosting ste thinking it's easy as pie, think again, I have to admit 2 years ago when i started I had rose tinted glasses on, they soon got removed.

But remember what PolurNET if it looks too good to be true it probably is. Also be aware of multiple posts advertising hosting, again means they are desperate for business.
 
0
•••
It's not 100GB/150GB; it's 5GB/150GB which is a reality for $5.

Do the math: 80GB server / 5GB pieces = 16 packages; 16 * $5 = $80; suggesting that their support is pretty horrible, that's about right :)

Although they might have more space /etc..... but who knows.
 
0
•••
Maybe like a lot of Script kiddies
And Oversell their server By 500%
But $5 is not a Viable business plan
And that website is only a cheap template
All I can say is if your websites are not worth $15 - $25 per month for the
hosting , then Maybe not worth having them and you should just park the names.
 
0
•••
They'd most likely have a 160gb hdd probably because it doesnt cost that much extra, so thats $160/month... BUT that would mean that they are overselling their bandwidth in that case, but if only selling 16 packages (80gb) not 32, then they wouldnt be overselling bandwidth...

So my analysis is that they are overselling by a little bit, but not much,
 
0
•••
Bandwidth can be obtained at $0.30/cents GB or less if you buy in bulk. Most of the time you buy a 10Mbps or a 100Mbps or more burstable speed and you can monitor your traffic easily. My guess is that they are using Dual Xeon's with Burstable connections of either 10Mbps or 100Mbps along with 200GB HDs. If they have their own DataCenter and oversell just right then they might be making a profit and providing good support and reliable service. I have yet to see anything really bad in regards to them (even though they might be competition I cannot find anything bad with their service).
 
0
•••
Offering huge bandwith may be also reflective of the kind of DC they are using, which is likely mediocre in terms of reliability, security (don't forget about that!) and peace-of-mind. Perhaps their own main website is hosted somewhere else, and not on the same server they're offering these "jaw-opening" deals on.

Just take precautions as much as possible when leaving to another place you're uncertain about and don't think price is the only factor to go on. There's tons of people caught on that mistake, as vip-ip can attest to that (he was with a $NP host first, then us, then NullNic, back to us...) :blink:
 
Last edited:
0
•••
PolurNET said:
I'm most certain they have one of those 2x160GB hard drive offers from their DC, thus decide to "why not take advantage by offering cheap plans, then con the customers after" type of thing. Moreover, offering huge bandwith is most probably also reflective of the kind of DC they are using, which is likely mediocre at best and terrible any other time, in terms of reliability, security (don't forget about that!) and peace-of-mind. I'd bet their own main website is hosted somewhere else, and not on the same server they're offering these "jaw-opening" deals on.

Hence, take precautions as much as possible and don't think price is the only factor to go on. There's tons of people caught on that mistake, as vip-ip can attest to that (he was with a $NP host first, then us, then NullNic, back to us...) :blink: It's only a matter of time you'll here horror stories pouring in about WHB once they get the new signups going. Good for them, bad for the customer.

As Dave (BFT) always remarks: lack of business plan=cheap script kiddies :hehe: Overselling is a term we use frequently with these kind of hosts, but definately it's obvious what they are doing this time. Let's get a google map of their physical location, only to realize it's a house or apartment in an agricultural zone of some city. :laugh:

Once again though they seem to have been longer in business than PolurNet or many other companies here. They claim they host over 22,000+ websites so I do not see where your logic is coming from? Last I checked you also have had some hot issues over at WHT with your own practices (advertising in competitors threads, hiring people for underwage costs, etc...) and now you are bashing another company? Lets get real here there is no point yet for any of us to bash our competition unless we can prove it, especially this one since nothing bad has been seen in regards to them as of yet.

I'm not one to just jump on the bandwagon here and say yes they suck because they offer such low prices (and they are a poetential threat to my customer base of course). Is it a high probability that they will not provide good service? Possibly but then again look at successful companies such as HostGator have been, do they oversell? Most definetly but they offer excellent support and services to all of their customers (overselling does not mean it's a bad thing if you have the proper business plan and resources).
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Hi Senad,

I'm wasn't intending to bash them, but want to point out there is a controversy going on whether such a policy they have is feasible in the long run, and if so, what factors are positive and negative about them. I admit sometimes other hosts can get carried away in amplifying certain negative details about others. I can't find any info on the number of customers they have, but reading WHT posts, seems there's both negative and positive feedback, one can say almost equally balanced.

Sure, WHT is a true battleground where hosts bash other hosts, that's clearly a problem there and hopefully it won't come here. People tend to talk negative and positive things about most companies, which is part of the routine.

However, as you said, without proof (something I pointed out at WHT myself) or factual knowledge about a company, it's not right to talk about them negatively per se. If there are customers from them who'd like to give their opinions that may be something to go on. Till then, we should keep completely neutral and see if they are able to sustain their service offerings.

Regards
 
0
•••
ow wow! if they accept PP i am gonna dump all my unused files on there :p see what they will do if i uploaded 360 GB of data includingall my backup s ( encrypted ofcourse, i aint that dumb! )

but for real .. maybe a offer like that will be over 10 years, for now it i think its unreal ;)
 
0
•••
xlusive said:
ow wow! if they accept PP i am gonna dump all my unused files on there :p see what they will do if i uploaded 360 GB of data includingall my backup s ( encrypted ofcourse, i aint that dumb! )

but for real .. maybe a offer like that will be over 10 years, for now it i think its unreal ;)

WebHostingBuzz ToS said:
1. Server Use

Your account is for your use only, and as the primary used, you agree to take responsibility for all usage of the account.

To avoid unfair resource distribution at no time shall Customer use more than 15 simultanious processes by and with any of Customer's applications and not upload any file larger than 10 megabyte. All images in a Customer's hosting account must be linked to from pages within the Customer's hosting account. It is a violation of this agreement if Customer uses this account as merely an image, sound or file library. Binary files such as images, video and sound (i.e MP3, WAV, RA, GIF, JPG but not limited to those file extensions) may only account for a maximum of 50% of Customer's total bandwidth usage before customer must upgrade to a higher performance solution.

All services provided by WebHostingBuzz.com may be used for lawful purposes only. Any violations of laws that apply to WebHostingBuzz.com, or any jurisdiction that applies to you or your site is strictly prohibited. This includes but is not limited to copyrighted material, intellectual property and threatening material. You are NOT allowed to upload any type of audio/video files (.mp3,.avi etc) that belong to other musical bands or solo artists UNLESS you have a prior permission of its reproduction on your website. Any website found violating United States or International Copyright Laws would be terminated instantly. No refunds will be issued in this case.
Sites that promote illegal activity or present content that is damaging to WebHostingBuzz.com are also strictly prohibited.

Illegal activity such as hacking and cracking that originates from your account is also strictly prohibited.

Domain name changes are NOT possible at WebHostingBuzz.com. One has to sign up fresh for the new domain name and cancel the previous order if need be. Please note that NO refunds are given in such situations. Please read the section 6 "Cancellation and Refunds" for further information in regards to the billing.

3. High Resource Usage Policy / Script Usage

Resources are defined as CPU usage, memory usage and available system resources. When an account is found to be manipulating resources, we may implement the following policy:

When an account is found to be manipulating resources, WebHostingBuzz.com reserves the right to suspend, terminate, or make appropriate changes to the account to prevent the account from continually manipulating resources. This policy is only used in extreme cases to prevent misuse and is in effect to keep our servers fast and stable at all times.

--Maximum of 200 emails (outgoing only) per hour per domain name is allowed.

--Maximum of 1000 emails (outgoing only) per day per domain name is permitted.

The following scripts and programs are BANNED from our servers due to resource manipulation / server misuse:


1. Flat file CGI based forums / message boards such as UBB, iKonboard and UlimateBB
2. IRC (Internet Relay Chat) scripts or bots
3. Eggdrops
4. Proxy Servers
5. The Anonymizer
6. Several formmail exploits of late have been causing some server instability because they have been used for spamming purposes. Because of this, and the security flaws found in all versions of Matt Wright's formmail, we have had no choice but to BAN this software in all versions. We will be removing any formmail scripts we find WITHOUT NOTICE. We recommend that you choose alternative PHP form mail scripts which are more secure.
7. Spamming / hacking / cracking scripts.
8. The webmail module for php-nuke is not allowed to be run on our servers, this module is creating a huge problem with SPAM and will no longer be allowed. If we find it we WILL delete it without ANY warning, if we find it a SECOND time, we will suspend your site until you acknowledge that you WILL NOT run this module.

Customer agrees that WebHostingBuzz will monitor and meter Customer's daily bandwidth and disk usage and in the event that Customer exceeds the bandwidth or disk usage allocated to each hosting package on any given day WebHostingBuzz may take corrective action which may, at WebHostingBuzz's sole discretion, include the assessment of additional charges, disconnection or discontinuance of any and all Services, or termination of this Agreement. All bandwidth is measured daily and monthly bandwidth allowances are divided by the calendar days of a given month to determine the daily bandwidth allowance. Customer agrees that in the event of a dispute WebHostingBuzz's monitoring reports shall be the final method of determination how much disk space and bandwidth was used and agrees to pay the excess usage charges when due. Customer's logs files are counted against any disk usage.

I've bolded their ToS statement which would mean that they can literally cancel you account if you use it just for storage ;). Always read the ToS :).

PolurNET said:
Hi Senad,

I'm wasn't intending to bash them, but want to point out there is a controversy going on whether such a policy they have is feasible in the long run, and if so, what factors are positive and negative about them. I admit sometimes other hosts can get carried away in amplifying certain negative details about others. I can't find any info on the number of customers they have, but reading WHT posts, seems there's both negative and positive feedback, one can say almost equally balanced.

Sure, WHT is a true battleground where hosts bash other hosts, that's clearly a problem there and hopefully it won't come here. People tend to talk negative and positive things about most companies, which is part of the routine.

However, as you said, without proof (something I pointed out at WHT myself) or factual knowledge about a company, it's not right to talk about them negatively per se. If there are customers from them who'd like to give their opinions that may be something to go on. Till then, we should keep completely neutral and see if they are able to sustain their service offerings.

Regards

Yes WHT is basically gone to the dogs because of false accusations and INets ability to be bought out for Unmetered/Unlimited Advertisements :imho: hence why I rarely post their anymore.

If we look in the long run HD will get bigger and bandwidth will become cheaper and cheaper as technology progresses. So in the long run...yes I'd say that their plans will most likely be feasable.
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back