It's probably worth noting that this is the same judge who has been assigned the TRX.com case, and has been rightfully beating up the trademark claimant in that case for a while. Currently pending in that case is the domain registrant's motion...
Chris, thanks for getting that transcript.
For a procedural hearing, it's a little unusual, and it might come across as a hearing on the merits, so it's worth adding some context to that.
Some folks file things in lawsuits simply because they...
Some of the exhibits seem more tangentially interesting than others.
The footnote in question is this one:
That’s a lot of effort for a fairly mundane proposition, but the reason may become apparent later on.
if you downloaded those from PACER, you can do the world a favor and install the RECAP browser extension. RECAP is the mechanism that uploads docs to Courtlistener. It’s a crime that our court system charges a page fee for pdfs.
No real surprises in there. As I noted upthread, the April 9 status conference transcript seemed to be of keen interest, and the brief relies on a statement of counsel during a procedural conference in order to establish a substantive point...
Most likely, the OP doesn't understand what they are saying. No, you can't register a mark that you aren't actually using.
Most of the time, people are talking about filed applications, not issued registration. In the US, it is currently...
Whether a domain name is identical or similar to a trademark is one of three things the complainant must prove in a UDRP dispute.
The other two things boil down to "what was your intent?"
But if you are buying names and putting them on sales...
Yup. I'm happy to look at something for a couple of minutes for an initial read. If people keep asking me questions after that, then I'm going to want to know who is paying for my time.
The length of time is independent of the facts. This is typical of a case in which I represented a complainant:
------------
https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/2084180.htm
Complainant is Chai Research Corp. ("Complainant"), represented...