NameSilo

Any worthless LLLL.coms ???

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
What is the worst LLLL.com combination you can imagine? What would it be worth, IYHO?
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
qxzv

That is the worst one I could think of.
 
0
•••
min wholesale is about $15 right now. Anything sold under that is bought rather quickly.
 
0
•••
tehforum said:
qxzv

That is the worst one I could think of.

qxzv is an anti premium and is not worst name. BTW why not qxzy then? V is a very popular letter in acronyms. It is compared to letters N, W, O, H by quality. I consider V as best among semi-premium letters.

The worst name must consist of 2 worst letters and 2 good letters with the most quantity of strokes :) I would say something like qzjk.com is really awfull because its unbalanced and uneven :) Perhaps gqkj.com is even worse :)
 
0
•••
uhmm I feel like this is going to a loong thread as soon as Filter joins it :)
 
0
•••
:lol:

V is fundamental to true anti-premiums for reasons Filter will elaborate on meticulously when he finds this thread :hehe:

Anti-premiums are actually not the worst LLLL.coms and routinely sell for more than single premiums. Not sure if it's the rarity factor or desirability in other countries. Perhaps a combination of both.

italiandragon said:
uhmm I feel like this is going to a loong thread as soon as Filter joins it :)
 
0
•••
Ergo said:
qxzv is an anti premium and is not worst name. BTW why not qxzy then? V is a very popular letter in acronyms. It is compared to letters N, W, O, H by quality. I consider V as best among semi-premium letters.

The worst name must consist of 2 worst letters and 2 good letters with the most quantity of strokes :) I would say something like qzjk.com is really awfull because its unbalanced and uneven :) Perhaps gqkj.com is even worse :)

i agree!

I find internal j and q to be the toughies.
 
0
•••
tehforum said:
qxzv

That is the worst one I could think of.
I'd probably agree with that. I don't buy into the whole anti-premium joke.
 
0
•••
Some letters we use here aren't used in other countries much (eg. China), so in essence, a triple bad letter LLLL.com with a single premium letter can in fact be worse than an LLLL.coms which contain 4 bad/semi-premium letters. Triple bad letter LLLL.coms form very few acronyms in the English world, but may very well be ripe in other languages.

Etab said:
I'd probably agree with that. I don't buy into the whole anti-premium joke.
 
0
•••
Anti-premiums? Are those like like antiheroes (if John Wayne is the classic hero than Woody Allen is probably the classic antihero)? Are anti-premiums the Woody Allens of the LLLL world?
 
0
•••
But of course!

Anti-premiums are LLLL.coms that look so ghastly to your average domainer that they wish there was an extra letter, hyphen, or even a number in it just to ease the pain caused by looking at such an attrocious pattern of bad letters arranged in the most sinister way to the disgust of all LLLL.com fanatics and to the praise of all anti-premium aficionados. These intellectual LLLL.com connoisseurs appreciate what a truly rare beast the anti-premium is and hold it in the highest esteem.


krx said:
Anti-premiums? Are those like like antiheroes (if John Wayne is the classic hero than Woody Allen is probably the classic antihero)? Are anti-premiums the Woody Allens of the LLLL world?
 
0
•••
urgh, just when I thought my ymqv is the worst LLLL I have regged:P.

 
0
•••
:lol: :alien: :lol:

:lol:

:lol:

good to see so much of the "wisdom of the anti-premium way" already posted in this thread ...

agree with what ergo said about true "pure" anti-premiums such as qxzy (which are among the rarest of LLLL combinations) - compared to the merely mediocre ... Seriously, does a single "premium letter" in the mix really add significant value in terms of acronym potential? That may be like buying 5 lottery tickets instead of 1 and expecting to actually see a better return on your "investment" for it. Meanwhile, the single non-anti-premium in the mix clashes like a pinstripe jacket over a plaid shirt ... (For some reason 'w' and 'h' and 'k' tend to induce the most cognitive dissonance to my English-language eye ... though these are all relatively low-frequency letters too I think.)

I like the "anti-hero" angle - very nice spin that hadn't occurred to me. The actual term "anti-premium" actually came up in a more apocalyptic context in the last hours of the buyout - a celebration of madness, and perhaps a harbinger of doom ... Before that, I also remember seeing an "all letters are equal" thread in the humor section on DNF ... which I didn't pay much attention to.

As far as investment potential relative to the rest of LLLL universe ... I don't recommend buying anti-premiums - unless you see one you actually like for some reason. (Full disclosure - I'd like to be able to continue buying them cheap over the next year or so ...)

I think at some point (probably a few years from now) they may start to see interest from low-budget newbies (such as myself) and could see prices comparable to CCC.com names (low $xxx minimum) ... Given that there is still a "scarcity premium" even with 46,656 CCC.com (as opposed to just 17,576 LLL.com) ... well, however many "anti-premiums" there actually are (however you want to define anti-premium) - those are going to be all that's left to trade once the rest of the LLLL.com are in the hands of end users rather than resellers.

And - mark my words - there will be end users for the anti-premiums as well. The mythical Dr. Quincy Xavier Zimbalist Jr. has yet to find his way to Sedo to make an offer that can't be refused for QXZJ, but he's out there, somewhere ... I just know it! Seriously, some people just like short domains, and can get creative with acronyms or not even bother - an LLLL address might be used more like a just a short phone number with letters instead of digits.

(I've already found a good "bottom line" use for short domains - since there is a 500 character limit for signatures here on NP - and the links to eBay auctions that I want to put in my sig sometimes are hideously long, adding up to more than 500 characters very quickly ... I just setup some redirects from my LXIQ domain instead - so can now fit many more links to current auctions into my signature, for whatever that's worth.)

Other end-users might be gamers, techies, and other younger types used to TXTNG LOTS LOL + DXNT CARE BOUT VWLS and similar lunatic fringe creative types ... An up-and-coming demographic perhaps. Or maybe not.

Bottom line for me is, if 10 months from now I might still be able to buy something like QXZY (I wish! that one's a gem!) for less than $20 ... and 5 years from now might easily sell it for $200, possibly even quite a bit more ... Well, it may not be a "great" ROI compared to other domains, but still a bit better than most conventional investments. (Calculate $20 plus another $40 for reg fees over 5 years ... So that's 60 in, 200 out = 140 profit - a bit over 200% ROI, works out to about 40% per year. Or if compounded annually, about 25%. For a relatively low risk, no-brainer play - try doing that in the stock market!)

so that's my anti-premium story, and I'm sticking to it! :)
 
Last edited:
0
•••
ipod.com or Anything with a trademark :)
/thread
 
0
•••
filter said:
:lol: :alien: :lol:

:lol:

:lol:

good to see so much of the "wisdom of the anti-premium way" already posted in this thread ...

agree with what ergo said about true "pure" anti-premiums such as qxzy (which are among the rarest of LLLL combinations) - compared to the merely mediocre ... Seriously, does a single "premium letter" in the mix really add significant value in terms of acronym potential? That may be like buying 5 lottery tickets instead of 1 and expecting to actually see a better return on your "investment" for it. Meanwhile, the single non-anti-premium in the mix clashes like a pinstripe jacket over a plaid shirt ... (For some reason 'w' and 'h' and 'k' tend to induce the most cognitive dissonance to my English-language eye ... though these are all relatively low-frequency letters too I think.)

I like the "anti-hero" angle - very nice spin that hadn't occurred to me. The actual term "anti-premium" actually came up in a more apocalyptic context in the last hours of the buyout - a celebration of madness, and perhaps a harbinger of doom ... Before that, I also remember seeing an "all letters are equal" thread in the humor section on DNF ... which I didn't pay much attention to.

As far as investment potential relative to the rest of LLLL universe ... I don't recommend buying anti-premiums - unless you see one you actually like for some reason. (Full disclosure - I'd like to be able to continue buying them cheap over the next year or so ...)

I think at some point (probably a few years from now) they may start to see interest from low-budget newbies (such as myself) and could see prices comparable to CCC.com names (low $xxx minimum) ... Given that there is still a "scarcity premium" even with 46,656 CCC.com (as opposed to just 17,576 LLL.com) ... well, however many "anti-premiums" there actually are (however you want to define anti-premium) - those are going to be all that's left to trade once the rest of the LLLL.com are in the hands of end users rather than resellers.

And - mark my words - there will be end users for the anti-premiums as well. The mythical Dr. Quincy Xavier Zimbalist Jr. has yet to find his way to Sedo to make an offer that can't be refused for QXZJ, but he's out there, somewhere ... I just know it! Seriously, some people just like short domains, and can get creative with acronyms or not even bother - an LLLL address might be used more like a just a short phone number with letters instead of digits.

(I've already found a good "bottom line" use for short domains - since there is a 500 character limit for signatures here on NP - and the links to eBay auctions that I want to put in my sig sometimes are hideously long, adding up to more than 500 characters very quickly ... I just setup some redirects from my LXIQ domain instead - so can now fit many more links to current auctions into my signature, for whatever that's worth.)

Other end-users might be gamers, techies, and other younger types used to TXTNG LOTS LOL + DXNT CARE BOUT VWLS and similar lunatic fringe creative types ... An up-and-coming demographic perhaps. Or maybe not.

Bottom line for me is, if 10 months from now I might still be able to buy something like QXZY (I wish! that one's a gem!) for less than $20 ... and 5 years from now might easily sell it for $200, possibly even quite a bit more ... Well, it may not be a "great" ROI compared to other domains, but still a bit better than most conventional investments. (Calculate $20 plus another $40 for reg fees over 5 years ... So that's 60 in, 200 out = 140 profit - a bit over 200% ROI, works out to about 40% per year. Or if compounded annually, about 25%. For a relatively low risk, no-brainer play - try doing that in the stock market!)

so that's my anti-premium story, and I'm sticking to it! :)

lol - and there it is! :D Phew, that took me a while! ;)

Have to agree with the majority of Filter's comments there.

It is the potential to find end users in China etc that can make these a viable investment.

I am personaly trying to focus on triple/quad premiums because that is the market I understand the best from an end user point of view.

I think anti-premiums will always be 'at the bottom of the pile' but will still increase in value in the same way that anti-premium LLL.com's have.

Back on topic - for me the worst domain would contain at least a 'Q' an 'X' and a 'Z'.

Rich B-)
 
0
•••
also remember with regard to potential Chinese-language end users ->

'V' isn't popular ... unless of course, they have an eye for the exotic "anti-premium" esthetic as well!

Q and X actually premium for Chinese, as far as I can tell.

In general anti-premiums are the "undervalued assets" play ... Though the risk is that they may continue to be undervalued for a few years while everything else takes off. So people focusing on the more obvious "acronym potential" premiums probably are going to see much better returns over the next year - though it's easier to get a bit ahead of the market when buying in a more competetive area ... Still, it's hard to really overpay that much in the reseller market when you consider potential for end user sales down the road ...

:imho:
 
0
•••
Well if V does not work for the Chinese then the Ultimate Anti-Premium has to have a V. Q, Z and X are the worst for English, so they go. Now the order: The last letter seems to be wherre the worst letters end up so that would be Q. Z is kinda sorta littlebit a vowel so it goes first to stop any pronouncable nonsense. So we get either ZXVQ or ZVXQ. I choose ZVXQ, it has less rhythm, the Ultimate Anti-Premium!
 
0
•••
looks like ZVXQ.com has been regged since April 2006 already ... Not developed though - parked with an English-language landing page. (Thinking I may make an offer for it when I have more funds available ...!)
 
0
•••
accentnepal said:
I choose ZVXQ, it has less rhythm, the Ultimate Anti-Premium!
And what would you pay for this this trophy anti-premium LLLL?
 
0
•••
I'll pay $30 today for a pure Z X Q V combo. Please send me a PM if you've got one.
 
0
•••
Adding on to what filter said earlier about people just generally liking short names..With short names you can always get acronyms for at least two or three of the letters. That could give you something to work with and develop right there. Take stock symbols for example..There is a symbol for just about all 2 letter combinations..There's half the battle right now ;)
 
0
•••
filter said:
I'll pay $30 today for a pure Z X Q V combo. Please send me a PM if you've got one.
Not me. I've been steering clear of the whole CCC and CCCC (and C-C-C and C-C-C-C., etc.) arena. Just trying to get my feet on the ground with domaining in general. This niche seems to require a more specialized knowledge (or at least a different knowledge) than keyword-focused domaining. I've also had the sense that the gig is about up - that the good deals are getting harder to find and that the competition is high - but that could probably be said of domaining in general...

Anyway, I've thought maybe it was too late to get into this game (and profit from it). But maybe not.
 
0
•••
really...they should add the popcorn emoticon here... :)


:great:
 
0
•••
tehforum said:
qxzv

That is the worst one I could think of.

Is qzxv better than qxzv? What I am saying is very simply that q's and zs etc arent the best but those 4 are not the worst.
 
0
•••
domainer50 said:
Is qzxv better than qxzv? What I am saying is very simply that q's and zs etc arent the best but those 4 are not the worst.

I think *where* the letters are makes a big difference. I have many that begin with q followed by 3 premium letters that imo, and it is just that, are very good.

I dont dislike q = quality quick queensland quebec quiet etc
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back