NameSilo

.mobi Zagat.mobi gets major press review

NamecheapNamecheap
Watch

saltysoda

Established Member
Impact
3
1
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
garrett200 said:
See, I think what is happening here is that corps are realizing the branding potential of .mobi.

At this point, I don't think it's that deep IMHO ... Zagat, like many of the companies reported here in this space, is keeping their options open with the delivery of their service / product to folks that are "on the go". Zagat has always been ahead of the curve in this respect, this is just another angle ... I'd be curious of the SPECIFICS and relationship between Zagat and mTLD (and Visa) and how, and for how long, they came to incorportate the .MOBI as part of this delivery! :gl: :imho:
I'm sure there is more than this small blurp on USA Today™ ... :talk:

BocaVision said:
Neil Edwards alluded to that Visa/Zagat relationship in his blog post, but without specificity ...

Exactly.

Just my two sense.
-Jeff B-)
 
0
•••
I don't want to put a damper on this great publicity for .mobi, but has anyone tried using zagat.mobi on their phone?

I just did and I can not get out of an endless loop. I tell it what city, then I have a selection of restaurant categories. I select any of the categories, then it want's me to select a city. I select the city again, then it shows me the categories again, and so on and so on.
 
0
•••
Perhaps it just needs a "tweak"? :|

Link: http://zagat.mobi (Scores a 4 on Ready.mobi (out of 5)) :blink:

It will probably display well on a mobile phone.

Your mobi.readiness score is calculated from the results displayed below. Failing tests and large page sizes both lower the score. Read through the report to understand how to improve your score - and your site.

mTLD, I believe, requires a score of 5 for compliance purposes ... :gl: :imho:
Please advise.
-Jeff B-)
 
0
•••
Jeff said:
Perhaps it just needs a "tweak"? :|

Link: http://zagat.mobi (Scores a 4 on Ready.mobi (out of 5)) :blink:



mTLD, I believe, requires a score of 5 for compliance purposes ... :gl: :imho:
Please advise.
-Jeff B-)

Looks fine for me on the emulator. I asked the question awhile back -- the concensus seemed to be that it was at mtld's discretion whether to take a site down or not (but what good press would come of taking this down in example?).
 
0
•••
Jeff said:
mTLD, I believe, requires a score of 5 for compliance purposes ...
Wrong. Basic compliance is:
-No frames
-No www required
-XHTML Mobile profile 1.0 or later
 
0
•••
scandiman said:
Wrong. Basic compliance is:
-No frames
-No www required
-XHTML Mobile profile 1.0 or later

Righto, that is the basic compliance ... hopefully they will come here soon to further clarify on the Ready.mobi score and coding requirements expectations, as well as standards (or levels of discretion) as to which "sites" are taken down and which remain up and "in good standing" IMHO. :gl:

-Jeff B-)
 
0
•••
Jeff said:
Righto, that is the basic compliance ... hopefully they will come here soon to further clarify on the Ready.mobi score and coding requirements expectations, as well as standards (or levels of discretion) as to which "sites" are taken down and which remain up and "in good standing" IMHO. :gl:

-Jeff B-)

Agreed. "Basic compliance" is an absolute joke... Surely someone couldn't have a multi-megabyte homepage on the .mobi extension?
 
0
•••
The site works on emulators, but is useless where it counts, my actual phone.
 
0
•••
allnicksgone said:
The site works on emulators, but is useless where it counts, my actual phone.

Ouch.
You should send an email to Laura Bly, USA TODAY™! :imho:

If you Google her, she's all over the place ... :talk:
-Jeff B-)
 
0
•••
*waiting for the "guys it takes time to get things right" response*
 
0
•••
allnicksgone said:
The site works on emulators, but is useless where it counts, my actual phone.
maybe it's your phone, because it works on mine! And quite well too.

Reece said:
Agreed. "Basic compliance" is an absolute joke...
I don't know ... mtld is a joke, basic compliance is a joke, their rfp is a joke, their whole marketing strategies are a joke.... Weird.., why some just keep wasting their time and energy complaining and ridiculing about something they just don't like, or believe in their abilities to make happen, but keep buying their products and saying they are a supporter of that product. And should that product become successful in the big marketplace, will come a proudly touting how they were an early supporter of it all along.


:bah:
 
Last edited:
0
•••
The made a .mobi site. They've promoted it on their site. It got some press on ABC and USA Today, and the site works fine. On to the next topic please. You can continue your spin there.
 
0
•••
Jeff said:
Ouch.
You should send an email to Laura Bly, USA TODAY™! :imho:

If you Google her, she's all over the place ... :talk:
-Jeff B-)

lol ... yea she needs to do a retraction because it's not populating correctly on nick's phone
 
0
•••
allnicksgone said:
The site works on emulators, but is useless where it counts, my actual phone.

Nick, what type of phone do you have? Just curious.
 
0
•••
Jeff said:
At this point, I don't think it's that deep IMHO ... Zagat, like many of the companies reported here in this space, is keeping their options open with the delivery of their service / product to folks that are "on the go". Zagat has always been ahead of the curve in this respect, this is just another angle ... I'd be curious of the SPECIFICS and relationship between Zagat and mTLD (and Visa) and how, and for how long, they came to incorportate the .MOBI as part of this delivery! :gl: :imho:
I'm sure there is more than this small blurp on USA Today™ ... :talk:



Exactly.

Just my two sense.
-Jeff B-)
You don't think it's that deep? Really Jeff, what's it going to take for you to understand that major corps are choosing to brand their mobile sites with the .mobi extension?

If Zagat isn't "in deep" with .mobi at this point, I've got a nice bridge to sell you Jeff.
 
0
•••
seanboy said:
Nick, what type of phone do you have? Just curious.

Samsung SCH-u740

I sent zagat an e-mail describing my trouble.

I am glad to hear it works on other phones. I hope it is only a small minority that have trouble.
 
0
•••
Nope, doesn't work on my phone neither :(

phone.jpg
 
0
•••
0
•••
allnicksgone said:
Samsung SCH-u740

I sent zagat an e-mail describing my trouble.

I am glad to hear it works on other phones. I hope it is only a small minority that have trouble.

Check your PM
 
0
•••
Really Jeff, what's it going to take for you to understand that major corps are choosing to brand their mobile sites with the .mobi extension?

You mean, like Comcast™ ?!? :|

Or, maybe, Google? :o
Go directly to mobile.google.com on your mobile device's browser.

seanboy said:
The made a .mobi site. They've promoted it on their site. It got some press on ABC and USA Today, and the site works fine. On to the next topic please. You can continue your spin there.

With the caveat that NO ONE here knows the the specific relationship between Zagat and mTLD (and Visa) ... and what this means, specifically, for .MOBI in the long run IMHO. Otherwise, onward and upward ... :talk:
-Jeff B-)
 
0
•••
Appraise.net

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomDB
NameFit
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back