I think namebio should charge money since so many people trust it as gospel. Excellent news if an auditable, high integrity resource.
They deserve to become a source of accurate real estate comp’s like information. Up until now, I have been a pundit of data integrity and only considered it entertainment news and questioned it all because DNJ reports and disclaims that sales proof are exempted from certain “well known sources”. That or sales that are reported but questionable or even sketchy with parked pages, no nameserver changes, or non paying buyers will be removed.
So my assumption before publishing private large sales, such sales data to be included will ALL be verified through Escrow or third party verification.
https://www.namepros.com/threads/ar...s-accurate-or-even-true.1113246/#post-7011526
Their huge contribution to parsing out all the reams of data on the Shill bidding scandal in 2017 was done for free, and posted was never compensated for by anyone afaik. Kudos to them for offering a paid service, they deserve all of our support. I do hope with some sort of tiered pricing depending on usage volume.
As I don’t care about $100 sales or Ngtld’s.
If they charge a fee, I can only assume they will be self auditing for continuous scrutiny of sales that are reported that after they are published from auctions or reported on DNJ then later they fall through, with non paying bidders or buyers those prices are erased. This must mean the sales price integrity will be filtered and screened and fully checked. Great news. One thing would be a field declaring the sale as end user or wholesale. Probably not cost effective, but would be nice. DNW,
@GeorgeK and Dotweekly all contribute to corporate sales data which is an important barometer of true sales value.
@Grilled contributed a ton of work also in this subject as well back in 2017.
https://www.namepros.com/threads/another-bidding-on-your-own-names.1050978/#post-6443853
https://www.namepros.com/threads/th...y-no-to-shady-practices.1055604/#post-6485212